Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35817803›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Network structure from a characterization of interactions in complex systems.

Thorsten Rings, Timo Bröhl, Klaus Lehnertz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: Reviews in networks in the brain system.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thorsten RingsDepartment of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. thorsten.rings@uni-bonn.de.
Timo BröhlDepartment of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Klaus LehnertzDepartment of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany. klaus.lehnertz@ukbonn.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many natural and man-made complex dynamical systems can be represented by networks with vertices representing system units and edges the coupling between vertices. If edges of such a structural network are inaccessible, a widely used approach is to identify them with interactions between vertices, thereby setting up a functional network. However, it is an unsolved issue if and to what extent important properties of a functional network on the global and the local scale match those of the corresponding structural network. We address this issue by deriving functional networks from characterizing interactions in paradigmatic oscillator networks with widely-used time-series-analysis techniques for various factors that alter the collective network dynamics. Surprisingly, we find that particularly key constituents of functional networks-as identified with betweenness and eigenvector centrality-coincide with ground truth to a high degree, while global topological and spectral properties-clustering coefficient, average shortest path length, assortativity, and synchronizability-clearly deviate. We obtain similar concurrences for an empirical network. Our findings are of relevance for various scientific fields and call for conceptual and methodological refinements to further our understanding of the relationship between structure and function of complex dynamical systems.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

PMID35817803
PMCPMC9273794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.