ArticleScientific data2022
Proteomic characterisation of triple negative breast cancer cells following CDK4/6 inhibition.
Article in Scientific data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential Preclinical Efficacy of Combined CDK4/6 and MEK Inhibition in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Based onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Alternate actions of CDK4/6 inhibitors beyond cell cycle blockade: unexplored roles in therapy resistance.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- 3D In Vitro Models of Breast Cancer: Current Challenges and Future Prospects Toward Recapitulating the Microenvironment and Mimicking Key Processes.Advanced biology · 2025Review
- Review
- Immune monitoring of neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- The effects of immortalization on the N-glycome and proteome of CDK4-transformed lung cancer cells.Glycobiology · 2024Article
- Role of β3 subunit of the GABA type A receptor in triple negative breast cancer proliferation, migration, and cell cycle progression.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2024Article
- The Evolving Pathways of the Efficacy of and Resistance to CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Recent advances in targeted strategies for triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- Proteins Found in the Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Secretome and Their Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Proteomic characterisation of triple negative breast cancer cells following CDK4/6 inhibition.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
When used in combination with hormone treatment, Palbociclib prolongs progression-free survival of patients with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Mechanistically, Palbociclib inhibits CDK4/6 activity but the basis for differing sensitivity of cancer to Palbociclib is poorly understood. A common observation in a subset of Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBCs) is that prolonged CDK4/6 inhibition can engage a senescence-like state where cells exit the cell cycle, whilst, remaining metabolically active. To better understand the senescence-like cell state which arises after Palbociclib treatment we used mass spectrometry to quantify the proteome, phosphoproteome, and secretome of Palbociclib-treated MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells. We observed altered levels of cell cycle regulators, immune response, and key senescence markers upon Palbociclib treatment. These datasets provide a starting point for the derivation of biomarkers which could inform the future use CDK4/6 inhibitors in TNBC subtypes and guide the development of potential combination therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.