Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816955›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2022

Estimating cumulative spatial risk over time with low-rank kriging multiple membership models.

Joseph Boyle, Mary H Ward, Stella Koutros, Margaret R Karagas, Molly Schwenn, Debra Silverman, David C Wheeler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph BoyleDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Mary H WardOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Stella KoutrosOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Margaret R KaragasDepartment of Epidemiology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Molly SchwennFormerly of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine Cancer Registry, Augusta, Maine, USA.
Debra SilvermanOccupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
David C WheelerDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8121-5182
National Cancer Institute · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USDartmouth College · USState of Maine Department of Health and Human Services · US

Funding

Cancer Risk and Environmental ExposuresZIACP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$41.3M
Modeling cancer risk and environmental and socio-spatial exposures using residential historiesU01CA259376 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI SABO, ROY TRAVIS · 2021 to 2024
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA259376NCI NIH HHS U01CA259376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many health outcomes result from accumulated exposures to one or more environmental factors. Accordingly, spatial risk studies have begun to consider multiple residential locations of participants, acknowledging that participants move and thus are exposed to environmental factors in several places. However, novel methods are needed to estimate cumulative spatial risk for disease while accounting for other risk factors. To this end, we propose a Bayesian model (LRK-MMM) that embeds a multiple membership model (MMM) into a low-rank kriging (LRK) model in order to estimate cumulative spatial risk at the point level while allowing for multiple residential locations per subject. The LRK approach offers a more computationally efficient means to analyze spatial risk in case-control study data at the point level compared with a Bayesian generalized additive model, and as increased precision in spatial risk estimates by analyzing point locations instead of administrative areas. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate the efficacy of the model and its improvement upon an existing multiple membership model that uses area-level spatial random effects to estimate risk. The results show that our proposed method provides greater spatial sensitivity (improvements ranging from 0.12 to 0.54) and power (improvements ranging from 0.02 to 0.94) to detect regions of elevated risk for disease across a range of exposure scenarios. Finally, we apply our model to case-control data from the New England bladder cancer study to estimate cumulative spatial risk while adjusting for many covariates.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationHumansRisk FactorsSpatial AnalysisBayesianbladder cancerresidential historyspatial cluster

Identifiers

PMID35816955
PMCPMC9489615
OpenAlexW4285043302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.