Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816683›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2022

A comparison of seasonal influenza and novel Covid-19 vaccine intentions: A cross-sectional survey of vaccine hesitant adults in England during the 2020 pandemic.

Vivi Antonopoulou, Louis Goffe, Carly J Meyer, Aikaterini Grimani, Fiona Graham, Jan Lecouturier, Mei Yee Tang, Paul Chadwick, Falko F Sniehotta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vivi AntonopoulouNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science, Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1002-4191
Louis GoffeNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3623-2458
Carly J MeyerNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science, Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2268-3055
Aikaterini GrimaniNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2076-6199
Fiona GrahamNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5828-0955
Jan LecouturierNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-5804
Mei Yee TangNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3116-6025
Paul ChadwickNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science, Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Clinical, Educational, and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7101-5993
Falko F SniehottaNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science - Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1738-4269
Newcastle University · GBUniversity College London · GBHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared intention to receive the seasonal influenza vaccine with a prospective coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine among undecided or COVID-19 vaccine hesitant individuals to better understand the underlying differences and similarities in factors associated with vaccine intention. We delivered a cross-sectional online survey in October-November 2020. We included psychological constructs and sociodemographic variables informed by theory. We conducted pairwise comparisons and multiple linear regression models to explore associations between vaccine intention and psychological constructs. We recruited 1,660 participants, where 47.6% responded that they would likely receive the influenza vaccine, 31.0% that they would probably not accept the vaccination and 21.4% were unsure. In relation to the prospective COVID-19 vaccine, 39.0% responded that they would likely receive the vaccination, 23.7% that they would probably not accept the vaccination and 37.3% were unsure.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandHumansIntentionPandemicsSeasonsSurveys and QuestionnairesVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza Vaccinesbehavioral modelsHealth Belief ModelPandemicTheory of Planned Behaviorvaccinationvaccine uptake

Identifiers

PMID35816683
PMCPMC9621000
OpenAlexW4285043052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.