ArticleBlood advances2022
Genomic and microenvironmental landscape of stage I follicular lymphoma, compared with stage III/IV.
Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- STAT6: Multidimensional analysis from hematopoietic immune regulation to pathogenesis mechanisms and therapeutic targets in hematologic malignancies.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- The Added Value of Genome-Wide Copy Numbers to Objectively Resolve Clonality of Multiple Tumors With Pulmonary Involvement and Ambiguous or Inconclusive Mutational Diagnosis.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
- Biology as vulnerability in follicular lymphoma: genetics, epigenetics, and immunogenetics.Blood · 2025Review
- Whole-genome sequencing reveals three follicular lymphoma subtypes with distinct cell of origin and patient outcomes.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Personalised therapy in follicular lymphoma - is the dial turning?Hematological oncology · 2024Review
- Mutational, immune microenvironment, and clinicopathological profiles of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma with BCL6 rearrangement.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Novel insights into the pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma by molecular profiling of localized and systemic disease forms.Leukemia · 2023Article
- The pathobiology of follicular lymphoma.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2023Article
- The clinical and molecular taxonomy of t(14;18)-negative follicular lymphomas.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Follicular Lymphoma Microenvironment Traits Associated with Event-Free Survival.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genetic and Microenvironment Features Do Not Distinguish Follicular Lymphoma Patients Requiring Immediate or Deferred Treatment.HemaSphere · 2023Article
- Review
- Follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma: how many diseases?Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 20 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Although the genomic and immune microenvironmental landscape of follicular lymphoma (FL) has been extensively investigated, little is known about the potential biological differences between stage I and stage III/IV disease. Using next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry, 82 FL nodal stage I cases were analyzed and compared with 139 FL stage III/IV nodal cases. Many similarities in mutations, chromosomal copy number aberrations, and microenvironmental cell populations were detected. However, there were also significant differences in microenvironmental and genomic features. CD8+ T cells (P = .02) and STAT6 mutations (false discovery rate [FDR] <0.001) were more frequent in stage I FL. In contrast, programmed cell death protein 1-positive T cells, CD68+/CD163+ macrophages (P < .001), BCL2 translocation (BCL2trl+) (P < .0001), and KMT2D (FDR = 0.003) and CREBBP (FDR = 0.04) mutations were found more frequently in stage III/IV FL. Using clustering, we identified 3 clusters within stage I, and 2 clusters within stage III/IV. The BLC2trl+ stage I cluster was comparable to the BCL2trl+ cluster in stage III/IV. The two BCL2trl- stage I clusters were unique for stage I. One was enriched for CREBBP (95%) and STAT6 (64%) mutations, without BLC6 translocation (BCL6trl), whereas the BCL2trl- stage III/IV cluster contained BCL6trl (64%) with fewer CREBBP (45%) and STAT6 (9%) mutations. The other BCL2trl- stage I cluster was relatively heterogeneous with more copy number aberrations and linker histone mutations. This exploratory study shows that stage I FL is genetically heterogeneous with different underlying oncogenic pathways. Stage I FL BCL2trl- is likely STAT6 driven, whereas BCL2trl- stage III/IV appears to be more BCL6trl driven.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.