Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816673›Full record

SynthesisPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2022

What Is Digital Parenting? A Systematic Review of Past Measurement and Blueprint for the Future.

Kathryn L Modecki, Rachel E Goldberg, Pamela Wisniewski, Amy Orben

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Theory for How Parental Monitoring Changes Youth Behavior.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Adolescent digital emotion regulation.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathryn L ModeckiMenzies Health Institute Queensland, School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-9748
Rachel E GoldbergDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine.
Pamela WisniewskiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida.
Amy OrbenMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/13
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns about parenting adolescents are not new, but the rapid diffusion of digital technologies has heightened anxieties over digital parenting. Findings are decidedly mixed regarding the impact of digital technologies on adolescent well-being, and parents are left to navigate their concerns without an empirically based road map. A missing link for understanding the state of the science is a clear characterization of how digital parenting is measured, including an evaluation of which areas demand an outsized share of scientific attention and which have been overlooked. To address this gap, we undertook two interdisciplinary systematic reviews of the digital-parenting literature and characterized measurement across (a) quantitative surveys (

Indexed as

ParentingParentsAdolescentHumansSurveys and Questionnairesadolescentadolescent developmentdigital parentingfamilyinterpersonal relationsmeasurementtechnology use

Identifiers

PMID35816673
PMCPMC9634335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.