Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816653›Full record

ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2022

[Reinsertion to the work in workers with partially permanent disability for hand injury].

Julio Ramírez-Ortiz, Iván Lozano-López, Beatriz González-Jiménez, Carolina Almendarez-Nieto, Rosa María Torres-Hernández, Félix Guillermo Marquez-Celedonio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julio Ramírez-OrtizInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 61, Departamento de Salud en el Trabajo. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-1254
Iván Lozano-LópezInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 61, Departamento de Salud en el Trabajo. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0551-883X
Beatriz González-JiménezUniversidad Veracruzana, Facultad de Medicina, Coordinación de Programas de Investigación. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4148-3454
Carolina Almendarez-NietoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar No. 57, Departamento de Salud en el Trabajo. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0002-6556-1381
Rosa María Torres-HernándezUniversidad Veracruzana, Facultad de Medicina, Coordinación de Programas de Investigación. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0002-4417-8914
Félix Guillermo Marquez-CeledonioUniversidad del Valle de México, Escuela de Ciencias de la Salud, Coordinación de Programas Investigación. Veracruz, Veracruz, México.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-9812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hand injuries resulting from accidents at work are one of the main causes of disability in workers. Every worker ruled with Partial Permanent Disability must legally be reinstated to the same workplace. Objective: To know the prevalence of reintegration and causes of non-reintegration into workers with Partial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries. Material and methods: A descriptive, observational, and retrospective study, which included 100% of the opinions of Parcial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries, generated from 2012 to 2016 at UMF 61 of Veracruz. Results: 143 cases were analyzed, 127 (88.8%) were men and 16 (11.2%) women, with a mean age of 37.3 ± 11.6 years. Labor reintegration in the same company occurred in 60 (42%) of the cases, 50 (35%) were reinstated in another company and 33 (23.1%) were not reinstated to work. Regarding work termination: 51 (35.7%) workers were laid off after their ruling, 13 (9.1%) resigned, 12 (8.4%) terminated their contract, and 7 (4.9%) were retired. Currently 72 (50.3%) workers continue to perform physical work and 18 (12.6%) did not return to work. Conclusions: Labor reintegration occurred in less than half of the cases ruled. The main cause of the non-reintegration was the unjustified dismissal by the company where the accident occurred. Not reintegrating into the same workplace has: legal, economic, medical and social implications to the worker.

Indexed as

Hand InjuriesPersons with DisabilitiesAccidents, OccupationalAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesWorkplaceAccidents, OccupationalHand InjuriesOccupational HealthOccupational Medicine

Identifiers

PMID35816653
PMCPMC10395928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.