ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2022
[Reinsertion to the work in workers with partially permanent disability for hand injury].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hand injuries resulting from accidents at work are one of the main causes of disability in workers. Every worker ruled with Partial Permanent Disability must legally be reinstated to the same workplace. Objective: To know the prevalence of reintegration and causes of non-reintegration into workers with Partial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries. Material and methods: A descriptive, observational, and retrospective study, which included 100% of the opinions of Parcial Permanent Disability due to hand injuries, generated from 2012 to 2016 at UMF 61 of Veracruz. Results: 143 cases were analyzed, 127 (88.8%) were men and 16 (11.2%) women, with a mean age of 37.3 ± 11.6 years. Labor reintegration in the same company occurred in 60 (42%) of the cases, 50 (35%) were reinstated in another company and 33 (23.1%) were not reinstated to work. Regarding work termination: 51 (35.7%) workers were laid off after their ruling, 13 (9.1%) resigned, 12 (8.4%) terminated their contract, and 7 (4.9%) were retired. Currently 72 (50.3%) workers continue to perform physical work and 18 (12.6%) did not return to work. Conclusions: Labor reintegration occurred in less than half of the cases ruled. The main cause of the non-reintegration was the unjustified dismissal by the company where the accident occurred. Not reintegrating into the same workplace has: legal, economic, medical and social implications to the worker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35816653PMC10395928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.