SynthesisBlood advances2022
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of novel agents vs chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory T-cell lymphomas: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of histone deacetylase inhibitors in peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Brentuximab vedotin addition to gemcitabine in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: a LYSA phase 2 study.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Radiotherapy in addition to systemic therapy reduces the early mortality of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-driven drug response prediction and mechanistic insights in cancer genomics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Global outcomes and prognosis for relapsed/refractory mature T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas: results from the PETAL consortium.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Optimal treatment strategies for (relapsed and refractory [R/R]) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) have not been well defined, and with the approval of several novel single agents (SA), the comparative efficacy of combination chemotherapy (CC) to single-agent strategies remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate overall response rates (ORR) and toxicities of SA to CC. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane were systematically searched for phase I, phase II, and phase III trials investigating a defined SA or an anthracycline-, ifosfamide-, gemcitabine-, and platinum-based regimens. One hundred and fifty-one articles were included, encompassing single and combinations of 60 phase I trials involving 1075 patients, 95 phase II trials involving 3246, and 23 phase III trials involving 1888 patients. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the trials. Using a random-effects model, the estimated ORR for SA in phase I trials were 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.7%, 46.9%) relative to 41% for CC (95% CI, 27.4%, 56.1%; P = .97) and in phase II trials 34.4% (95% CI, 30.4%, 38.7%) for SA vs 55.3% (95% CI, 31%, 77.2%; P = .1) for CC. There were significant subgroup differences in ORR between histological subtypes of PTCL and drug classes. Our results highlight SA as an attractive outpatient option for R/R PTCL, and their incorporation in the development of upfront treatment paradigms merits urgent consideration. Our results underscore enrollment in clinical trials of SA as a critical strategy for R/R PTCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.