ArticlePloS one2022
Evaluating tubulointerstitial compartments in renal biopsy specimens using a deep learning-based approach for classifying normal and abnormal tubules.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplant Pathology: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Relevance to the Banff Framework.Kidney international reports · 2026Review
- Kidney Segmentation of Histopathological Images with Edge-Aware U-Net to Support Medical Diagnosis and Treatment Planning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in genitourinary pathology.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Towards Fine-grained Renal Vasculature Segmentation: Full-Scale Hierarchical Learning with FH-Seg.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- PrPSeg: Universal Proposition Learning for Panoramic Renal Pathology Segmentation.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence Reporting Guidelines' Adherence in Nephrology for Improved Research and Clinical Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- A Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Biopsy System For Kidney Transplant Patients.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A Spatially Guided Machine-Learning Method to Classify and Quantify Glomerular Patterns of Injury in Histology Images.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- Omni-Seg: A Scale-Aware Dynamic Network for Renal Pathological Image Segmentation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2023Article
- Article
- High-throughput image analysis with deep learning captures heterogeneity and spatial relationships after kidney injury.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in renal pathology: Current status and future.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal pathology is essential for diagnosing and assessing the severity and prognosis of kidney diseases. Deep learning-based approaches have developed rapidly and have been applied in renal pathology. However, methods for the automated classification of normal and abnormal renal tubules remain scarce. Using a deep learning-based method, we aimed to classify normal and abnormal renal tubules, thereby assisting renal pathologists in the evaluation of renal biopsy specimens. Consequently, we developed a U-Net-based segmentation model using randomly selected regions obtained from 21 renal biopsy specimens. Further, we verified its performance in multiclass segmentation by calculating the Dice coefficients (DCs). We used 15 cases of tubulointerstitial nephritis to assess its applicability in aiding routine diagnoses conducted by renal pathologists and calculated the agreement ratio between diagnoses conducted by two renal pathologists and the time taken for evaluation. We also determined whether such diagnoses were improved when the output of segmentation was considered. The glomeruli and interstitium had the highest DCs, whereas the normal and abnormal renal tubules had intermediate DCs. Following the detailed evaluation of the tubulointerstitial compartments, the proximal, distal, atrophied, and degenerated tubules had intermediate DCs, whereas the arteries and inflamed tubules had low DCs. The annotation and output areas involving normal and abnormal tubules were strongly correlated in each class. The pathological concordance for the glomerular count, t, ct, and ci scores of the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology remained high with or without the segmented images. However, in terms of time consumption, the quantitative assessment of tubulitis, tubular atrophy, degenerated tubules, and the interstitium was improved significantly when renal pathologists considered the segmentation output. Deep learning algorithms can assist renal pathologists in the classification of normal and abnormal tubules in renal biopsy specimens, thereby facilitating the enhancement of renal pathology and ensuring appropriate clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.