Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816495›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Evaluating tubulointerstitial compartments in renal biopsy specimens using a deep learning-based approach for classifying normal and abnormal tubules.

Satoshi Hara, Emi Haneda, Masaki Kawakami, Kento Morita, Ryo Nishioka, Takeshi Zoshima, Mitsuhiro Kometani, Takashi Yoneda, Mitsuhiro Kawano, Shigehiro Karashima and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Towards Fine-grained Renal Vasculature Segmentation: Full-Scale Hierarchical Learning with FH-Seg.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. PrPSeg: Universal Proposition Learning for Panoramic Renal Pathology Segmentation.Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satoshi HaraMedical Education Research Center, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Emi HanedaSchool of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Masaki KawakamiSchool of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kento MoritaSchool of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Ryo NishiokaDepartment of Rheumatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takeshi ZoshimaDepartment of Rheumatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KometaniDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Takashi YonedaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KawanoDepartment of Rheumatology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-2116
Shigehiro KarashimaInstitute of Liberal Arts and Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Hidetaka NamboSchool of Electrical Information Communication Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kanazawa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal pathology is essential for diagnosing and assessing the severity and prognosis of kidney diseases. Deep learning-based approaches have developed rapidly and have been applied in renal pathology. However, methods for the automated classification of normal and abnormal renal tubules remain scarce. Using a deep learning-based method, we aimed to classify normal and abnormal renal tubules, thereby assisting renal pathologists in the evaluation of renal biopsy specimens. Consequently, we developed a U-Net-based segmentation model using randomly selected regions obtained from 21 renal biopsy specimens. Further, we verified its performance in multiclass segmentation by calculating the Dice coefficients (DCs). We used 15 cases of tubulointerstitial nephritis to assess its applicability in aiding routine diagnoses conducted by renal pathologists and calculated the agreement ratio between diagnoses conducted by two renal pathologists and the time taken for evaluation. We also determined whether such diagnoses were improved when the output of segmentation was considered. The glomeruli and interstitium had the highest DCs, whereas the normal and abnormal renal tubules had intermediate DCs. Following the detailed evaluation of the tubulointerstitial compartments, the proximal, distal, atrophied, and degenerated tubules had intermediate DCs, whereas the arteries and inflamed tubules had low DCs. The annotation and output areas involving normal and abnormal tubules were strongly correlated in each class. The pathological concordance for the glomerular count, t, ct, and ci scores of the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology remained high with or without the segmented images. However, in terms of time consumption, the quantitative assessment of tubulitis, tubular atrophy, degenerated tubules, and the interstitium was improved significantly when renal pathologists considered the segmentation output. Deep learning algorithms can assist renal pathologists in the classification of normal and abnormal tubules in renal biopsy specimens, thereby facilitating the enhancement of renal pathology and ensuring appropriate clinical decisions.

Indexed as

Deep LearningKidney TransplantationNephritis, InterstitialBiopsyHumansKidneyKidney Tubules

Identifiers

PMID35816495
PMCPMC9273082
OpenAlexW4285008463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.