Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816485›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics of moderate to fulminant psittacosis pneumonia.

Xiaoying Li, Tao Xiao, Pengzhi Hu, Kun Yan, Jiongxing Wu, Xinya Tu, Yishu Tang, Hong Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Psittacosis Outbreak in Europe: A Concern for Public Health.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Diagnosis ofFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparison of clinical features betweenFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical features and risk factors of liver injury in patients withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoying LiDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Tao XiaoDepartment of Nursing, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Pengzhi HuDepartment of Radiology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kun YanDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jiongxing WuDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xinya TuDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yishu TangDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hong XiaDepartment of Emergency, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0193-7033
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsittacosis pneumonia is a community-acquired pneumonia caused by Chlamydia psittaci. It is usually under-diagnosed due to its atypical clinical presentation and lack of routine laboratory tests.

methodsTo better understand the clinical features, 52 patients diagnosed with psittacosis pneumonia by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) were enrolled in this study. The clinical, radiological and pathological characteristics were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsThe onset of psittacosis pneumonia in this study occurred all year round, with a peak from December to January. Most of the patients were 51-80 years old. About 65.38% of patients had a history of exposure to poultry or parrots. Abnormalities of multiple clinical signals were detected in these patients. Elevated levels of neutrophil ratio, C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and procalcitonin were detected in most patients. Radiological evidence revealed air-space consolidation or ground-glass opacities in lungs of all patients, which is the typical feature of psittacosis pneumonia. In addition, hyperemia, swelling of bronchial mucosa, and bronchial patency were detected by bronchoscopy in all patients, and bronchial sub-mucosal edema, inflammatory cells infiltration and alveolar epithelial hyperplasia were identified in the bronchial mucosa and alveolar tissue. Beta-lactam antibiotics were administered for empirical treatment before mNGS in 17 patients but showed no improvement. The treatment was switched to doxycycline or moxifloxacin immediately since psittacosis pneumonia were suspected and confirmed by mNGS detection (within 48 hours). After receiving adjustment of treatment, 94.23% (49/52) of patients were cured successfully.

conclusionsIn conclusion, mNGS may be a promising approach for clinical diagnosis of psittacosis. For patients with a history of exposure to birds, hyperpyrexia, nonproductive cough, multiple elevated inflammatory markers, and air-space consolidation in lung, psittacosis pneumonia should be considered, especially when beta-lactam antibiotics showed limited efficacy.

Indexed as

Chlamydial PneumoniaChlamydophila psittaciPneumoniaPsittacosisAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsHumansHyperplasiaMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactams

Identifiers

PMID35816485
PMCPMC9273088
OpenAlexW4285013109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.