ArticlePloS one2022
Application of image processing and soft computing strategies for non-destructive estimation of plum leaf area.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based modeling for accurate leaf area estimation in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars.PloS one · 2026Article
- Competence of omeprazole and chitosan nanoparticles as promising approaches for enhancing vegetative growth and leaf anatomical structure of plum under low nitrogen conditions.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Machine learning techniques for non-destructive estimation of plum fruit weight.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting the quality attributes related to geographical growing regions in red-fleshed kiwifruit by data fusion of electronic nose and computer vision systems.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant leaf area (LA) is a key metric in plant monitoring programs. Machine learning methods were used in this study to estimate the LA of four plum genotypes, including three greengage genotypes (Prunus domestica [subsp. italica var. claudiana.]) and a single myrobalan plum (prunus ceracifera), using leaf length (L) and width (W) values. To develop reliable models, 5548 leaves were subjected to experiments in two different years, 2019 and 2021. Image processing technique was used to extract dimensional leaf features, which were then fed into Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS). Model evaluation on 2019 data revealed that the LMR structure LA = 0.007+0.687 L×W was the most accurate among the various LMR structures, with R2 = 0.9955 and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) = 0.404. In this case, the linear kernel-based SVR yielded an R2 of 0.9955 and an RMSE of 0.4871. The ANN (R2 = 0.9969; RMSE = 0.3420) and ANFIS (R2 = 0.9971; RMSE = 0.3240) models demonstrated greater accuracy than the LMR and SVR models. Evaluating the models mentioned above on data from various genotypes in 2021 proved their applicability for estimating LA with high accuracy in subsequent years. In another research segment, LA prediction models were developed using data from 2021, and evaluations demonstrated the superior performance of ANN and ANFIS compared to LMR and SVR models. ANFIS, ANN, LMR, and SVR exhibited R2 values of 0.9971, 0.9969, 0.9950, and 0.9948, respectively. It was concluded that by combining image analysis and modeling through ANFIS, a highly accurate smart non-destructive LA measurement system could be developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.