Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816479›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

The unified protocol as an internet-based intervention for emotional disorders: Randomized controlled trial.

Carmen Schaeuffele, Sophie Homeyer, Luis Perea, Lisa Scharf, Ava Schulz, Christine Knaevelsrud, Babette Renneberg, Johanna Boettcher

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Accelerated Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Anxiety Disorders in a VHA System.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmen SchaeuffeleDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5902-0725
Sophie HomeyerDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-1363
Luis PereaDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0166-1268
Lisa ScharfDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ava SchulzDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Christine KnaevelsrudDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Babette RennebergDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna BoettcherDepartment of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DEPsychologische Hochschule Berlin · DEUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Unified Protocol (UP) as a transdiagnostic intervention has primarily been applied in the treatment of anxiety disorders and in face-to-face-settings. The current study investigated the efficacy of a 10-week Internet-based adaptation of the UP for anxiety, depressive, and somatic symptom disorders. The trial was registered under DRKS00014820 at the German Clinical Trial Registry, DRKS. Participants (n = 129) were randomized to treatment or waitlist control. Significant treatment effects were found for symptom distress, satisfaction with life, positive/negative affect and markers of anxiety, depression, and somatic symptom burden (within-group Hedges' g = 0.32-1.38 and between-group g = 0.20-1.11). Treatment gains were maintained at 1- and 6-month-follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed comparable effects in participants with anxiety and depressive disorders. 26.6% dropped out of treatment and 35.38% did not provide post-treatment assessments. The results strengthen the application of the UP as an Internet-based treatment for alleviating symptom distress across emotional disorders. More research on the applicability for single disorders is needed and avenues to improve adherence and attrition rates should be explored.

Indexed as

Internet-Based InterventionMedically Unexplained SymptomsAnxiety DisordersHumansInternetMood DisordersTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35816479
PMCPMC9273095
OpenAlexW4285012290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.