Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816307›Full record

SynthesisJAMA network open2022

Factors Correlated With Physical Function 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Unni Olsen, Maren Falch Lindberg, Christopher Rose, Eva Denison, Caryl Gay, Arild Aamodt, Jens Ivar Brox, Øystein Skare, Ove Furnes, Kathryn Lee and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07367789 (Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07367789 recruitingnot on this map

Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsInstrumented Insole Gait Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Knee osteoarthritis: disease burden, available treatments, and emerging options.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Unni OlsenDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maren Falch LindbergDepartment of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christopher RoseDivision for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Eva DenisonDivision for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Caryl GayDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.
Arild AamodtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Jens Ivar BroxDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Øystein SkareDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Ove FurnesNorwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kathryn LeeDepartment of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco.
Anners LerdalDepartment of Patient Safety and Research, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOUniversity of California, San Francisco · USOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: More than 1 in 5 patients do not experience improved physical function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Identification of factors associated with physical function may be warranted to improve outcomes in these patients. Objective: To identify preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with physical function at 12 months after TKA in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: Data from January 2000 to October 2021 were searched in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). No language restrictions were applied. Study Selection: Prospective observational studies or randomized clinical trials on factors associated with physical function after TKA in adult patients with osteoarthritis were selected. A prespecified peer-reviewed protocol was followed. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, 2 reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts and judged risk of bias using Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS). Multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate mean correlations between factors and physical function with 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for each QUIPS domain. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was physical function 12 months after TKA. Secondary outcomes were physical function 3 and 6 months after TKA. All estimates are mean correlations between factors and postoperative function. Positive correlations correspond to better function. Results: Among 12 052 articles, 20 studies (including 11 317 patients and 37 factors) were analyzed. Mean correlation with higher BMI was estimated to be -0.15 (95% CI, -0.24 to -0.05; P = .33; moderate-certainty evidence), while mean correlation with better physical function was estimated to be 0.14 (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26; P = .03; low-certainty evidence) and mean correlation with more severe osteoarthritis was estimated to be 0.10 (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.19; P = .17; high-certainty evidence). In sensitivity analyses, mean correlation with better physical function was estimated to be 0.20 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.36; P = .02), and so perhaps a larger coefficient than in the main analysis, while mean correlations were estimated to be similar for other factors (BMI: -0.17; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.06; P < .001; osteoarthritis severity: 0.10; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.20; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that higher presurgical BMI was correlated with worse physical function (with moderate certainty) and that better physical function (low certainty) and osteoarthritis severity (high certainty) were correlated with better physical function after TKA. These findings suggest that these factors should be included when testing predictive models of TKA outcomes.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeOsteoarthritis, KneeAdultHumansObservational Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID35816307
PMCPMC9274324
OpenAlexW4285027517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.