Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35816093›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

The evolutionary history of human spindle genes includes back-and-forth gene flow with Neandertals.

Stéphane Peyrégne, Janet Kelso, Benjamin M Peter, Svante Pääbo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ancient DNA and Human Physiology.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. TheScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Dentition of the Mugharet El'Aliya Fossil Human Maxilla, Morocco.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  6. Archaic hominin admixture and its consequences for modern humans.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stéphane PeyrégneDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-9102
Janet KelsoDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3618-322X
Benjamin M PeterDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2526-8081
Svante PääboDepartment of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-6311
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DE

Funding

European Research Council 694707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins associated with the spindle apparatus, a cytoskeletal structure that ensures the proper segregation of chromosomes during cell division, experienced an unusual number of amino acid substitutions in modern humans after the split from the ancestors of Neandertals and Denisovans. Here, we analyze the history of these substitutions and show that some of the genes in which they occur may have been targets of positive selection. We also find that the two changes in the kinetochore scaffold 1 (KNL1) protein, previously believed to be specific to modern humans, were present in some Neandertals. We show that the

Indexed as

HominidaeNeanderthalsAnimalsBiological EvolutionBlack PeopleFossilsGene FlowHumansevolutionary biologygene flowgeneticsgenomicshumanhuman evolutionneandertalspositive selectionspindle

Identifiers

PMID35816093
PMCPMC9273211
OpenAlexW4285018310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.