Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815890›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgery2022

A Systematic Review of Operative Team Familiarity on Metrics of Efficiency, Patient Outcomes, Cost, and Team Satisfaction.

Hunter D D Witmer, Ankit Dhiman, Alonzo D Jones, Alison M Laffan, Dan Adelman, Kiran K Turaga

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Platform for Operating Room Teams Reduces Cross-Specialty Turnover Time: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hunter D D WitmerDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Ankit DhimanDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Alonzo D JonesUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Alison M LaffanHealth Sciences Department, NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Dan AdelmanUniversity of Chicago Booth School of Business, Chicago, IL.
Kiran K TuragaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study seeks to systematically review the current literature on how surgical team familiarity relates to metrics of operative efficiency.

backgroundThe operating room (OR) is a complex environment involving numerous multidisciplinary interactions that must interface precisely to achieve a successful outcome.

methodsA systematic search of the PubMed database was prospectively registered in the National Institute for Health Research PROSPERO database (CRD 42020181046) and performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Exposure variable was team familiarity and outcome measures included operative efficiency, patient outcomes, costs, and/or team satisfaction.

resultsOf 1123 articles screened, 15 studies involving 24,340 operations met inclusion criteria. All studies were limited to an individual specialty, procedure, or both. The effects of more familiar teams were most pronounced in decreasing operative times [standardized mean difference of -0.51 (95% confidence interval: -1.00, -0.02), P =0.04], whereas the reported impacts on patient clinical outcomes, material waste, and team satisfaction were much more heterogenous.

conclusionsImproving OR team familiarity is associated with superior operative efficiency and may be associated with other favorable measures. Further inferences are limited by literature heterogeneity, yet could be a novel focus for improving OR performance.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamPersonal SatisfactionBenchmarkingHumansOperating RoomsPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID35815890
OpenAlexW4285033851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.