ArticleDrug delivery2022
Preparation and
Article in Drug delivery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and characterization of a topical ferrochelatase inhibitor nanoemulsion for choroidal neovascularization therapy.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- Review
- Emulsion and Emulgel-Based Ophthalmic Drug Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Botanical Flavonoids: Efficacy, Absorption, Metabolism and Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology for Improving Bioavailability.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Progress in Nanotechnology for Treating Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries: Reflecting on Advances in Ophthalmology.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Pharmacological Potentials and Delivery Strategies of Isoliquiritigenin: Challenges and Advances in Enhancing Bioavailability.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
- Selection Criteria for Oils, Surfactants, and Co-Surfactants in Ocular Nanoemulsion Formulation: A Mini Review.Current pharmaceutical design · 2025Review
- ALKBH5 Regulates Corneal Neovascularization by Mediating FOXM1 M6A Demethylation.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Formulating Resveratrol and Melatonin Self-Nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SNEDDS) for Ocular Administration Using Design of Experiments.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Development of Osthole-Loaded Microemulsions as a Prospective Ocular Delivery System for the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessments.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- An emerging era in manufacturing of drug delivery systems: Nanofabrication techniques.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Isoliquiritigenin Nanoemulsion Preparation by Combined Sonication and Phase-Inversion Composition Method: In Vitro Anticancer Activities.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isoliquiritigenin (ISL), as a natural flavonoid, has been proven to have therapeutic potential for corneal neovascularization (CNV) treatment; however, its therapeutic use is restricted due to its poor aqueous solubility and limited bioavailability. To overcome these limitations, a novel ISL-loaded nanoemulsion (ISL-NE) was designed for inhibiting CNV in this study. ISL-NE formulation was composed of propylene glycol dicaprylate (PGD), Cremophor® EL (EL35), polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG 400) and adding water with sodium hyaluronate, its particle size was 34.56 ± 0.80 nm with a low polydispersity index of less than 0.05, which suggested a narrow size distribution. The results demonstrated that ISL-NE released higher and permeated more drug than ISL suspension (ISL-Susp) in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.