Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815680›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

Evolution of β-lactamase-mediated cefiderocol resistance.

Christopher Fröhlich, Vidar Sørum, Nobuhiko Tokuriki, Pål Jarle Johnsen, Ørjan Samuelsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Update on the comparativeJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Siderophore cephalosporins.EcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Combating Metallo-β-Lactamase-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Insights intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher FröhlichDepartment of Chemistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2682-2267
Vidar SørumDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Nobuhiko TokurikiMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Pål Jarle JohnsenDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Ørjan SamuelsenDepartment of Pharmacy, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-2614
UiT The Arctic University of Norway · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Northern Norway Regional Health Authority SFP1292-16The Graduate School in Infection Biology and AntimicrobialsThe National Graduate School in BiocatalysisThe Norwegian PhD School of PharmacyUiT The Arctic University of Norway
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCefiderocol is a novel siderophore β-lactam with improved hydrolytic stability toward β-lactamases, including carbapenemases, achieved by combining structural moieties of two clinically efficient cephalosporins, ceftazidime and cefepime. Consequently, cefiderocol represents a treatment alternative for infections caused by MDR Gram-negatives.

objectivesTo study the role of cefiderocol on resistance development and on the evolution of β-lactamases from all Ambler classes, including KPC-2, CTX-M-15, NDM-1, CMY-2 and OXA-48.

methodsDirected evolution, using error-prone PCR followed by selective plating, was utilized to investigate how the production and the evolution of different β-lactamases cause changes in cefiderocol susceptibility determined using microbroth dilution assays (MIC and IC50).

resultsWe found that the expression of blaOXA-48 did not affect cefiderocol susceptibility. On the contrary, the expression of blaKPC-2, blaCMY-2, blaCTX-M-15 and blaNDM-1 substantially reduced cefiderocol susceptibility by 4-, 16-, 8- and 32-fold, respectively. Further, directed evolution on these enzymes showed that, with the acquisition of only 1-2 non-synonymous mutations, all β-lactamases were evolvable to further cefiderocol resistance by 2- (NDM-1, CTX-M-15), 4- (CMY-2), 8- (OXA-48) and 16-fold (KPC-2). Cefiderocol resistance development was often associated with collateral susceptibility changes including increased resistance to ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam as well as functional trade-offs against different β-lactam drugs.

conclusionsThe expression of contemporary β-lactamase genes can potentially contribute to cefiderocol resistance development and the acquisition of mutations in these genes results in enzymes adapting to increasing cefiderocol concentrations. Resistance development caused clinically important cross-resistance, especially against ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCeftazidimeAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCefiderocolCephalosporinsDrug CombinationsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzabicyclo Compoundsbeta-LactamasesCefiderocolCeftazidimeCephalosporinsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID35815680
PMCPMC9410664
OpenAlexW4285043121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.