Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815475›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2022

Results of Ring-Testing of a Semifield Study Design to Investigate Potential Impacts of Crop Protection Products on Bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) and a Proposal of a Potential Test Design.

Olaf Klein, Ivo Roessink, Charlotte Elston, Lea Franke, Tobias Jütte, Silvio Knäbe, Johannes Lückmann, Jozef van der Steen, Matthew J Allan, Annika Alscher and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Olaf KleinEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Ivo RoessinkWageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-8282
Charlotte ElstonSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre Bracknell, Berkshire, UK.
Lea FrankeEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Tobias JütteInstitute for Bee Protection, Julius Kühn-Institut Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (JKI), Braunschweig, Germany.
Silvio KnäbeEurofins Agroscience Services Ecotox, Niefern-Öschelbronn, Germany.
Johannes LückmannRIFCON, Hirschberg, Germany.
Jozef van der SteenAlveus AB Consultancy, Oisterwijk, The Netherlands.
Matthew J AllanAtlantic Pollination, Glenrothes, UK.
Annika AlscherRIFCON, Hirschberg, Germany.
Kristin AmselBioChem Agrar, Machern/OT, Gerichshain, Germany.
Magdaléna CornementInnovative Environmental Services (IES), Witterswil, Switzerland.
Nina ExelerBayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany.
Juan Sorlí GuerolaTrialcamp SLU, Alcasser, Spain.
Bettina HodappInnovative Environmental Services (IES), Witterswil, Switzerland.
Carole JenkinsEnvigo, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Stefan KimmelCorteva Agriscience Germany, Muenchen, Germany.
Verena TänzlerBayer CropScience, Monheim, Germany.
RLP AgroScience (Germany) · DEBayer (Germany) · DEBausch Health (Germany) · DEEnvigo (United Kingdom) · GBJulius Kühn-Institut · DESyngenta (United Kingdom) · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Europe, the risk assessment for bees at the European Union or national level has always focussed on potential impacts on honeybees. During the revision of the European Food Safety Authority bee guidance it was explicitly stated that bumblebees and solitary bees should be considered as well and consequently concerns were raised regarding the representativeness of honeybees for these other bee species. These concerns originate from differences in size as well as differences in behavioral and life history traits of other bee species. In response to this concern, the non-Apis working group of the International Commission for Plant-Pollinator Relationships initiated a ring-test of a semifield tunnel study design using the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Nine laboratories participated, validating and improving the proposed design over a 2-year period. The intention of the ring-test experiments was to develop and if possible, establish a test protocol to conduct more standardized semifield tests with bumblebees. In the present study, the results of the ring-tests are summarized and discussed to give recommendations for a promising experimental design. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2548-2564. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

Indexed as

HymenopteraAnimalsBeesCrop ProtectionEcotoxicologyResearch DesignRisk AssessmentBumblebeeCrop protection productsEcotoxicologyNon-ApisRisk assessmentTest design

Identifiers

PMID35815475
PMCPMC9804372
OpenAlexW4285007474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.