Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815273›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Biomarkers of Metabolomics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Damp-Heat Syndrome: A Preliminary Study.

Xingxing Wu, Kexin Liu, Qi Wu, Mao Wang, Xuelian Chen, Yuge Li, Lin Qian, Changyin Li, Guoliang Dai, Qide Zhang and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingxing WuGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6339-4348
Kexin LiuGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-1922
Qi WuGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8717-4174
Mao WangEthics Committee, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-093X
Xuelian ChenGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-1974
Yuge LiGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5978-0214
Lin QianGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-7112
Changyin LiClinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6232-966X
Guoliang DaiClinical Pharmacology Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8319-9374
Qide ZhangDigestive Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4212-4311
Genglin MuInstitute of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Drum Tower Clinical Medicine College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0903-5475
Jing WuInstitute of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing University, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Drum Tower Clinical Medicine College of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210008, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-0500
Zhaowei ShanGastroenterology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5644-8010
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to investigate the potential biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and IBD with damp-heat syndrome (IBD-DH) by metabolomics. Methods: Plasma and urine samples were collected from 15 healthy controls and 30 IBD patients, including 15 IBD-DH and 15 IBD with spleen deficiency syndrome (IBD-SD), which was coded as SF8G and SF70 according to the International Classification of Diseases Eleventh Revision (ICD-11) issued by World Health Organization. Pseudotargeted metabolomics method was used based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry and triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Results: Under the condition of false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, variable importance projection (VIP) > 1.0, and fold change (FC) > 1.5 or < 2/3, we found 57 plasma differential metabolites and 20 urinary differential metabolites in IBD. Then, with area under the curve (AUC) ≥ 0.85 and FC ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.3, 11 potential biomarkers were identified, such as acylcarnitine (ACar 20:4, ACar 18:1, and ACar 20:3), 3-indoleacetic acid, hippuric acid, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, which is related to intestinal microbiota and immune response. However, less obvious differences were observed in IBD-DH when compared with IBD-SD. Under the condition of FDR < 0.2, VIP >1.0, and FC > 1.5 or < 2/3, we identified 16 plasma differential metabolites. In urine samples, IBD-DH and IBD-SD had the same metabolite pattern. With AUC ≥ 0.80, 7 differential plasma metabolites, mainly glycerophospholipids, were identified in IBD-DH. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis indicated that metabolic pathways, such as citrate cycle and amino acids metabolism, were mainly responsible for the distinction between IBD and healthy controls, whereas glycerophospholipid metabolism perturbation was not only a manifestation of IBD but also an important pathway to distinguish two subtypes defined by traditional medicine, IBD-DH and IBD-SD. Conclusion: In this study, we found that several metabolites of aromatic acids and lipid derivatives could act as potential biomarkers to discriminate IBD from healthy controls. Glycerophospholipids metabolites might be used to differentiate IBD-DH from IBD-SD.

Identifiers

PMID35815273
PMCPMC9270137
OpenAlexW4283745938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.