Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815241›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Lessons from the frontline: The COVID-19 pandemic emergency care experience from a human resource perspective in the Pacific region.

Claire E Brolan, Sarah Körver, Georgina Phillips, Deepak Sharma, Lisa-Maree Herron, Gerard O'Reilly, Rob Mitchell, Mangu Kendino, Penisimani Poloniati, Berlin Kafoa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. From crisis to commitment: nursing students' sense of belonging during and immediately after the covid-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Claire E BrolanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sarah KörverAustralasian College for Emergency Medicine, Melbourne, Australia.
Georgina PhillipsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Deepak SharmaEmergency Department, Colonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji.
Lisa-Maree HerronSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Gerard O'ReillySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rob MitchellSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mangu KendinoPort Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea.
Penisimani PoloniatiEmergency Department, Vaiola Hospital, Nuku'alofa, Tonga.
Berlin KafoaPublic Health Division, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Suva, Fiji.
Megan CoxFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Alfred Health · AUThe University of Queensland · AUAtenisi Institute · TOAustralasian College for Emergency Medicine · AUColonial War Memorial Hospital · FJPort Moresby General Hospital · PGSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of the South Pacific · FJ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study explores emergency care (EC) and other frontline healthcare worker (HCW) experiences responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Pacific region. The crisis has reinforced the crucial role well-trained, resourced, and supported EC providers play in supporting vital health systems and services in all global regions not only during 'business as usual' periods, but in times of tremendous stress and surge. Methods: Qualitative data were collected from EC providers and relevant stakeholders in three research phases in 2020 and 2021. Data on the World Health Organization's (WHO) Human Resources Building Block, adapted for the Pacific EC context, was thematically analysed. Key findings were further analysed to identify enablers and barriers to effective EC pandemic management. Findings: 116 participants from across the Pacific region participated in this study. Five themes emerged: (1) EC providers performed multiple pandemic roles; (2) Importance of authorities' valuing frontline HCWs; (3) HCW mental health and exhaustion; (4) HCW tension managing stigma, personal/professional expectations, and chronic health needs; and (5) Building health and human resource capacity. Interpretation: This study significantly contributes to the limited scientific literature on HCW experiences responding to COVID-19 across the Pacific. Recommendations arising out of this research align with consensus priorities and standards that were identified pre-pandemic by health stakeholders across the Pacific for enhancing EC system development. With limited HCWs available for many Pacific nations, it is imperative the dignity and welfare of local HCWs is genuinely prioritised. Funding: Epidemic Ethics/WHO, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office/Wellcome Grant 214711/Z/18/Z. Co-funding: Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Foundation, International Development Fund Grant.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency careHealthcare workersHealth system building blocks healthhealth system strengtheningHealth workforceHuman resourcesPacificPacific regionPandemic

Identifiers

PMID35815241
PMCPMC9253868
OpenAlexW4283831045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.