Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815206›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2022

Two-Photon Absorption: An Open Door to the NIR-II Biological Window?

Paige A Shaw, Ewan Forsyth, Fizza Haseeb, Shufan Yang, Mark Bradley, Maxime Klausen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paige A ShawEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ewan ForsythEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Fizza HaseebEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Shufan YangEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mark BradleyEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Maxime KlausenEaStCHEM School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The way in which photons travel through biological tissues and subsequently become scattered or absorbed is a key limitation for traditional optical medical imaging techniques using visible light. In contrast, near-infrared wavelengths, in particular those above 1000 nm, penetrate deeper in tissues and undergo less scattering and cause less photo-damage, which describes the so-called "second biological transparency window". Unfortunately, current dyes and imaging probes have severely limited absorption profiles at such long wavelengths, and molecular engineering of novel NIR-II dyes can be a tedious and unpredictable process, which limits access to this optical window and impedes further developments. Two-photon (2P) absorption not only provides convenient access to this window by doubling the absorption wavelength of dyes, but also increases the possible resolution. This review aims to provide an update on the available 2P instrumentation and 2P luminescent materials available for optical imaging in the NIR-II window.

Indexed as

fluorescent imaginginfrared dyesnear-infrared IIpulsed laserstissue penetrationtwo-photon absorptiontwo-photon microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35815206
PMCPMC9263132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.