Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815196›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2022

Fast-HBR: Fast hash based duplicate read remover.

Sami Altayyar, Abdel Monim Artoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sami AltayyarDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 51178, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.
Abdel Monim ArtoliDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 51178, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms produce massive amounts of data to analyze various features in environmental samples. These data contain multiple duplicate reads which impact the analyzing process efficiency and accuracy. We describe Fast-HBR, a fast and memory-efficient duplicate reads removing tool without a reference genome using de-novo principles. It uses hash tables to represent reads in integer value to minimize memory usage for faster manipulation. Fast-HBR is faster and has less memory footprint when compared with the state of the art De-novo duplicate removing tools. Fast-HBR implemented in Python 3 is available at https://github.com/Sami-Altayyar/Fast-HBR.

Identifiers

PMID35815196
PMCPMC9200608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.