ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2022
Follow-up outcomes of mucosal defect closures after endoscopic resection using a helix tacking system and endoclips.
Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- RCT comparing the clinical efficacy and costs of two tissue approximation devices in the closure of large post-endoscopic resection defects.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Successful endoscopic closure of a duodenal anastomotic leak using a through-the-scope suturing device.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Peranal endoscopic myectomy for early rectal cancer with closure using a through-the-scope helical tack and suture system.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- A helix tacking system for the management of colonic anastomotic dehiscence, after a laparoscopic left colectomy.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- The Current Landscape of Endoscopic Submucosal Training in the United States.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Advances in endoscopic closure techniques for endoscopic full-thickness resection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Through-the-scope tack application for defect closure following endoscopic submucosal dissection.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Large defect closure using a helix tacking system and endoclips after endoscopic submucosal dissection of two adjacent colonic lesions.Endoscopy · 2024Article
- Endoscopic suturing for mucosal defect closure following endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The X-Tack endoscopic HeliX tacking system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Tex, USA) has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and is slowly gaining popularity for the closure of large tissue defects. Despite its increasing use, outcome data of using the X-Tack system for mucosal defect closure after endoscopic resection (ER) are limited. Here, we report the follow-up outcomes of a series of cases that underwent ER and mucosal closure aided by the HeliX tacking system. Methods: We identified a total of 5 cases in which the X-Tack system and endoclips were used for mucosal defect closure after ER. The cases involved ER of large and/or flat polyps in the duodenum and colon. The patients were followed up at 4, 6, and 9 months after ER. Results: In all cases, X-Tacks with endoclips achieved complete closure of the large mucosal defects. None of the patients experienced any adverse events, such as abdominal pain or bleeding. At follow-up, the X-Tacks either fell off or were seen grouped or situated as a single piece (tack) in the mucosa where initially placed. None of the endoclips were found during the follow-up endoscopic examinations. Conclusions: The X-Tack system together with endoclips facilitated complete closure of large mucosal defects, especially for lesions located in difficult locations. At follow-up, several retained X-Tacks were found either in groups or as a single piece. The X-Tacks seen in groups will likely fall off with repetitive pulling forces with food or feces. However, the single tacks that were secured in the wall may stay indefinitely. The novel HeliX tacking system seems to be a promising aid for the effective closure of large mucosal defects; however, further studies are needed to assess the long-term outcome of this novel system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.