Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815157›Full record

ArticleACM transactions on computing for healthcare2022

Detecting Smartwatch-based Behavior Change in Response to a Multi-domain Brain Health Intervention.

Diane J Cook, Miranda Strickland, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM transactions on computing for healthcare, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detecting the Impact of Older Adult Healthy Brain Aging Behaviour Adoption Using Smart Home Technology.Proceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diane J CookWashington State University.
Miranda StricklandWashington State University.
Maureen Schmitter-EdgecombeWashington State University.

Funding

Creating adaptive, wearable technologies to assess and intervene for individuals with ADRDsR35AG071451 · NIA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, DIANE JOYCE, SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, MAUREEN · 2021 to 2025
$4.4M
A clinician-in-the-loop smart home to support health monitoring and intervention for chronic conditions: Supplement to focus on Alzheimer's and/or other dementiasR01NR016732 · NINR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Diane Joyce Cook, Roschelle Fritz · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Multidisciplinary undergraduate training program in Health-assistive Smart EnvironmentsR25AG046114 · NIA · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, DIANE JOYCE, MINOR, BRYAN · 2014 to 2025
$3.4M
Smart Technologies for Health Assessment and AssistanceR01EB009675 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, DIANE JOYCE, SCHMITTER-EDGECOMBE, MAUREEN · 2010 to 2017
$2.6M
NIA NIH HHS R25 AG046114NIA NIH HHS R35 AG071451NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009675NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we introduce and validate a computational method to detect lifestyle change that occurs in response to a multi-domain healthy brain aging intervention. To detect behavior change, digital behavior markers (DM) are extracted from smartwatch sensor data and a Permutation-based Change Detection (PCD) algorithm quantifies the change in marker-based behavior from a pre-intervention, one-week baseline. To validate the method, we verify that changes are successfully detected from synthetic data with known pattern differences. Next, we employ this method to detect overall behavior change for n=28 BHI subjects and n=17 age-matched control subjects. For these individuals, we observe a monotonic increase in behavior change from the baseline week with a slope of 0.7460 for the intervention group and a slope of 0.0230 for the control group. Finally, we utilize a random forest algorithm to perform leave-one-subject-out prediction of intervention versus control subjects based on digital marker delta values. The random forest predicts whether the subject is in the intervention or control group with an accuracy of 0.87. This work has implications for capturing objective, continuous data to inform our understanding of intervention adoption and impact.

Indexed as

Activity recognitionBehavior change detectionBehavior interventionMachine learning from time series

Identifiers

PMID35815157
PMCPMC9268550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.