ArticleHeliyon2022
Translation, validity and reliability of decision style scale in forensic psychiatric setting in Indonesia.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of the presence of bruxism in school-age children on oral health and children's quality of life.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026Article
- The impact of an educational program on the electronic waste management knowledge and practices of dental interns: an interventional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a 15-item health literacy classification model using integrated psychometric approaches in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of Group Sessions with Pre-recorded Presentations on Digital and Postpartum Health Literacy Among Arab American Women.Maternal and child health journal · 2026Article
- Development of a clinical triage readiness and practice assessment tool for midwives in the maternity units of South Africa.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Social connection and sociodemographic predictors of stroke caregivers' burden during COVID-19 pandemic lockdown.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Functional Foods Among the Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Bangladesh.Health science reports · 2026Article
- User experience and feasibility of CVD risk models: a study on clinician and patient expectations, and implementation in primary healthcare with P-CARDIAC pilot study in Hong Kong.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2026Article
- Linking knowledge, attitudes, and practices to sustainable solid waste, water, and energy use in Egyptian households.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Attitudes and acceptance of mRNA-based vaccine for neglected tropical diseases: A multi-country study in Asia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Mindful Movement Programs in Community and University Preschools: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Adaptation and validation of the Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale (WEIMS) in pharmacy students based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT).BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Using an implementation research approach to assess the birth outcomes associated with the 2016 World Health Organization antenatal care policy across states in Nigeria: multilevel analysis of national survey data.BMC global and public health · 2025Article
- Midwives' Perspectives on the Adoption of a Digitalized Triage System in South African Maternity Units: Results from a Mixed-Methods Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Pilot Study of Menstrual Health Education, Attitudes, and Product Access in Rural Honduras.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Article
- A multivariate analysis of the impact of knowledge and relationships on perceptions about aging among generation Z-a starting point for public health strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Assessment of eHealth Literacy in Healthcare Service Users: Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2025Article
- Testing the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index using Fitbit devices: a cross-sectional analysis.Korean journal of family medicine · 2025Article
- Students' Well-Being and Academic Engagement: A Multivariate Analysis of the Influencing Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Clinical reasoning as an essential skill for psychiatrists, especially in forensic psychiatry, relies on their thinking and decision-making skills. However, not all psychiatrists are aware of their decision-making styles. This study examines the validity and reliability of the Indonesian translation of the Decision Style Scale (DSS) instrument among general psychiatrists in the Indonesian forensic psychiatry setting. Method: This is a cross-sectional study involving 32 general psychiatrists from all nine psychiatric residency training centers in Indonesia. The study was conducted between August 2020 and February 2021. The translation process involved certified independent translators. The validity was tested using Item-Level Content Validity Index (I-CVI), Scale-Level Level Content Validity Index (S-CVI), and item-total correlation. Internal consistency reliability was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Results: After translation, the instrument was sent back and received feedback from the original authors of DSS. The final version of DSS was valid with an I-CVI score of 0.84-1 and an S-CVI score of 0.99. All but one item had a corrected item-total correlation of more than 0.30. The reliability test of DSS also showed acceptable results with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.43-0.83, and an overall internal consistency score of 0.83 and 0.62 for intuitive and rational scales, respectively. Conclusion: DSS serves as a valid, reliable, and readily-available tool to measure psychiatrists' decision-making styles in forensic psychiatry settings. Enhancing psychiatrists' awareness of their decision-making styles may help in mitigating the risk of bias in forensic psychiatry evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.