Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35815098›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2022

Mechanical Methods for the Induction of Labour After Previous Caesarean Section - An Updated, Evidence-based Review.

Werner Rath, Lars Hellmeyer, Panagiotis Tsikouras, Patrick Stelzl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Werner RathMedizinische Fakultät, Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Lars HellmeyerKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Panagiotis TsikourasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Patrick StelzlUniversitätsklinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria.
Democritus University of Thrace · GRKepler Universitätsklinikum · ATKlinikum im Friedrichshain · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are currently no up-to-date evidence-based recommendations on the preferred method to induce labour after previous Caesarean section, especially for patients with unripe cervix, as randomised controlled studies are lacking. Intravenous oxytocin and misoprostol are contraindicated in these women because of the high risk of uterine rupture. In women with ripe cervix (Bishop Score > 6), intravenous administration of oxytocin is an effective procedure with comparable rates of uterine rupture to those with spontaneous onset of labour. Vaginal prostaglandin E

Indexed as

balloon catheterhygroscopic cervical dilatorsinduction of labour after Caesarean sectionprostaglandinsuterine rupture

Identifiers

PMID35815098
PMCPMC9262630
OpenAlexW4221041908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.