Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Efficacy of Phase II Remote Home Rehabilitation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Cardiac Telerehabilitation in Improving Functional Capacity, Quality Of Life and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome and/or Coronary Revascularisation (PCI/CABG): A Systematic Review Comparing Telerehabilitation With Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease following percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of home-based cardiac telerehabilitation programs in improving clinical outcomes after PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Non-pharmacological nursing interventions in patients with myocardial infarction: a systematic review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Sex and Gender-Based Differences in Outcomes of Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025Review
- Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy and Impact of Home-Based Cardiac Telerehabilitation on Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Improving outcomes in acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis of home-based compared to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation and usual care: 3-4 months (end of the program) and 9-10 months (6 months after the end of the program).American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Alternative Models of Cardiac Rehabilitation to Promote Secondary Prevention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Scoping Review.The Journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2025Article
- Co-designing a cardiac rehabilitation program with knowledge users for patients with cardiovascular disease from a remote area.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Effect of different pre-hospital first aid methods on the efficacy and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction with left heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of home-based cardiac rehabilitation and traditional outpatient rehabilitation in stage II after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: From September 2019 to March 2020, 80 AMI patients in Cangzhou Central Hospital were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: the control group or the observation group, 40 cases in each group. The control group received old-fashioned outpatient rehabilitation treatment, and the study group received long-distance family rehabilitation nursing intervention. The blood pressure, examination results, compliance, satisfaction evaluation, incidence of cardiac events, heart rate, quality of life score, and 6-minute walking test were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no deaths in both groups. There were significant differences in heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, unplanned readmission rate, walking compliance, and 6-minute walking test at 6 months after discharge ( Conclusion: Home rehabilitation is a new home cardiac rehabilitation model with high efficiency, convenience, and whole process monitoring and barrier-free follow-up management. It can effectively improve the cardiac function, workout patience and worth of life expectancy of victims with AMI, improve their self-management awareness and rehabilitation compliance, reduce the risk of cardiac events, and have a positive impact on the prognosis and rehabilitation of patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.