ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2022
Scientific statement on the maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates in various crops.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates in apricots and cherries.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels in various plant commodities resulting from the use of potassium phosphonates.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue levels in leeks and spring onions/green onions/Welsh onions resulting from the use of potassium phosphonates.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Scientific statement on the maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European Commission mandated EFSA to issue a scientific statement, in accordance with Article 31 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, providing an overview of the maximum residue levels for potassium phosphonates in different products. This statement should be based on the maximum residue levels recently proposed by EFSA in several Reasoned Opinions published between June 2021 and January 2022 and the maximum residue levels supported in preparation of an EU position at the 52nd Codex Committee on Pesticides Residues. EFSA prepared a scientific statement containing a summary of the maximum residue levels proposed, including a reference to the scientific output on which the recommendation for each product is based and a justification for the selected values when different ones were proposed by the different outputs. An updated consumer risk assessment, based on the consolidated list of MRLs for the enforcement of phosphonic acid residues, was calculated. No risk for consumers was identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.