Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814867›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in chemical biology2021

Detecting and inactivating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 under the auspices of electrochemistry.

Ghazala Ashraf, Ayesha Aziz, Rubina Naz Qaisrani, Wei Chen, Muhammad Asif

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A review on the recent achievements on coronaviruses recognition using electrochemical detection methods.Microchemical journal : devoted to the application of microtechniques in all branches of science · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ghazala AshrafDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
Ayesha AzizDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
Rubina Naz QaisraniInstitute of Chemical Sciences, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, 29050, Pakistan.
Wei ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan, 430074, PR China.
Muhammad AsifHubei Key Laboratory of Plasma Chemistry and Advanced Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, 430205, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNGomal University · PKWuhan Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent epidemic of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has turned out to be a huge public health concern owing to its fast transmission. Rapid and cost-effective detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial to classify diseased individuals. Serological examination based on antibody chromatography as a substitute to RT-PCR provides inadequate help owing to sophisticated personnel, false-positive results, special equipment and high cost. Biosensing techniques provide sensitive and specific detection, recognition and quantification of pathogens. Herein, after an introduction, we review potential electrochemical (EC) biosensors for COVID-19 diagnosis, emphasizing plasmonic, optical, colorimetric and aptamer-based sensors with a special focus on EC biosensors and point-of-care (POC) diagnostic methods. We have conferred the working principle of these biosensors, EC performance in terms of particular analytical figures of merit and their real-time applications in biological matrices. Lastly, we have described briefly the inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by EC oxidation. In the end, we have concluded this review by clearing up the strengths and weaknesses of EC sensors and future directions. Advancement in research and technology would be our unsurpassed weapons in the fight against COVID-19 and preventing imminent pandemics.

Indexed as

DetectionElectrochemical sensorElectrochemistryNanomaterialsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35814867
PMCPMC7917468
OpenAlexW3134184045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.