ArticleAnnals of operations research2022
Testing the animal spirits theory for ethical investments: further evidence from aggregated and disaggregated data.
Article in Annals of operations research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to test the animal spirits theory by Akerlof and Shiller (Animal spirits - how human psychology drives the economy, and why it matters for global capitalism? Princeton University Press) for ethical stock markets using Islamic and sustainable stock indexes during calm and crisis periods. This question helps determine whether ethical finance is driven more by its specific rules or determined by animal spirits. We used data covering January 1996-September 2021, which includes both calm periods and crisis periods (dot-com bubble of 2000, subprime crisis of 2007, global financial crisis of 2008-2009, and COVID-19 recession). Accordingly, we applied different time series tests, ran a quantile regression, and built an econometric framework to empirically test the animal spirits theory. We provide two key findings. First, investor sentiment and consumer confidence significantly affect the dynamics of both ethical stock returns, suggesting further evidence of animal spirits. This finding supports the assumption that investors' emotions and sentiments affect their behaviors and related feelings, for example, spontaneous instinctive that urge to action than inaction, optimism, and so forth, might help to apprehend some investment actions. Second, and interestingly, animal spirit effects enter asymmetrically and nonlinearly as their effects on ethical stock returns are time-varying and vary with the quantile under consideration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.