Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

"Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned" (DOLL): A Qualitative Study to Develop a Classification Framework for Reporting Clinical Debriefing Results.

Méryl Paquay, Nadège Dubois, Anh Nguyet Diep, Gwennaëlle Graas, Tamara Sassel, Justine Piazza, Jean-Christophe Servotte, Alexandre Ghuysen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Comparative analysis of routine clinical debriefings and incident reports: insights for patient safety and teamwork enhancement.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Méryl PaquayDepartment of Emergency, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Nadège DuboisCenter for Medical Simulation of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Anh Nguyet DiepBiostatistics Unit, Quartier Hôpital, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Gwennaëlle GraasCenter for Medical Simulation of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Tamara SasselCenter for Medical Simulation of Liege, Quartier Hôpital, University of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Justine PiazzaDepartment of Emergency, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege, Liège, Belgium.
Jean-Christophe ServotteNamur Simulation, Namur-Liege-Luxembourg University College, Namur, Belgium.
Alexandre GhuysenDepartment of Emergency, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 crisis has radically affected our healthcare institutions. Debriefings in clinical settings provide a time for the clinicians to reflect on the successes (pluses) and difficulties (deltas) encountered. Debriefings tend to be well-received if included in the broader management of the unit. The goal of this study was to develop a framework to categorize these debriefings and to assess its worthiness. Methods: A qualitative approach based on a grounded theory research method was adopted resulting in the "Debriefing and Organizational Lessons Learned" (DOLL) framework. Debriefings were conducted within two Emergency Departments of a Belgian University Hospital during an 8-week period. In the first step, three researchers used debriefing transcripts to inductively develop a tentative framework. During the second step, these three researchers conducted independent categorizations of the debriefings using the developed framework. In step 3, the team analyzed the data to understand the utility of the framework. Chi-square was conducted to examine the associations between the item types (pluses and deltas) and the framework's dimensions. Results: The DOLL is composed of seven dimensions and 13 subdimensions. Applied to 163 debriefings, the model identified 339 items, including 97 pluses and 242 deltas. Results revealed that there was an association between the frequency of pluses and deltas and the dimensions ( Conclusion: The framework increases the potential value of clinical debriefings because it organizes results into actionable areas. Indeed, leadership found the DOLL to be a useful management tool. Further research is needed to investigate how DOLL may work in non-crisis circumstances and further apply the DOLL into incident reporting and risk management process of the unit.

Indexed as

clinical debriefingdebriefinghospital managementlearning organizationpatient safetyquality of careteamwork

Identifiers

PMID35814768
PMCPMC9263566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.