Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814719›Full record

ArticleBMJ nutrition, prevention & health2022

Consumption of industrial processed foods and risk of premenopausal breast cancer among Latin American women: the PRECAMA study.

Isabelle Romieu, Neha Khandpur, Aikaterini Katsikari, Carine Biessy, Gabriela Torres-Mejía, Angélica Ángeles-Llerenas, Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero, Gloria Inés Sánchez, Maria Elena Maldonado, Carolina Porras and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ nutrition, prevention & health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Isabelle RomieuCentre for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Neha KhandpurDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Aikaterini KatsikariNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Carine BiessyNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Gabriela Torres-MejíaCentre for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Angélica Ángeles-LlerenasCentre for Population Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Isabel Alvarado-CabreroServicio de Patología del Hospital de Oncología, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico.
Gloria Inés SánchezGroup Infection and Cancer, School of Medicine, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Maria Elena MaldonadoGrupo Impacto de los Componentes Alimentarios en la Salud, School of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Carolina PorrasAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas (ACIB) - Fundación INCIENSA, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Ana Cecilia RodriguezAgencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas (ACIB) - Fundación INCIENSA, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Maria Luisa GarmendiaInstituto de Nutrición y de Tecnología de los Alimentos, Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Vèronique ChajésNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Elom K AglagoNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Peggy L PorterDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
MingGang LinDivision of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mathilde HisNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Marc J GunterNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Inge HuybrechtsNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.
Sabina RinaldiNutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-1204
PRECAMA team
Centre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRFred Hutch Cancer Center · USInstituto Costarricense de Investigación y Enseñanza en Nutrición y Salud · CRInstituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXUniversidad de Antioquia · COEmory University · USHarvard University · USMexican Social Security Institute · MXUniversity of Chile · CL

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-processed food intake has been linked to an increased risk of breast cancer in Western populations. No data are available in the Latin American population although the consumption of ultra-processed foods is increasing rapidly in this region. We evaluated the association of ultra-processed food intake to breast cancer risk in a case-control study including 525 cases (women aged 20-45 years) and 525 matched population-based controls from Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica and Mexico. The degree of processing of foods was classified according to the NOVA classification. Overall, the major contributors to ultra-processed food intake were ready-to-eat/heat foods (18.2%), cakes and desserts (16.7%), carbonated and industrial fruit juice beverages (16.7%), breakfast cereals (12.9%), sausages and reconstituted meat products (12.1%), industrial bread (6.1%), dairy products and derivatives (7.6%) and package savoury snacks (6.1%). Ultra-processed food intake was positively associated with the risk of breast cancer in adjusted models (OR

Indexed as

nutrition assessment

Identifiers

PMID35814719
PMCPMC9237890
OpenAlexW4205146764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.