Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814671›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2022

How Metabolomics Provides Novel Insights on Celiac Disease and Gluten-Free Diet: A Narrative Review.

Mirco Vacca, Annalisa Porrelli, Francesco Maria Calabrese, Tamara Lippolis, Ilaria Iacobellis, Giuseppe Celano, Daniela Pinto, Francesco Russo, Gianluigi Giannelli, Maria De Angelis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mirco VaccaDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Annalisa PorrelliDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Francesco Maria CalabreseDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Tamara LippolisNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis," Institute of Research, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Ilaria IacobellisDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe CelanoDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Daniela PintoHuman Microbiome Advanced Project-HMPA, Giuliani SpA, Milan, Italy.
Francesco RussoNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis," Institute of Research, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Gianluigi GiannelliNational Institute of Gastroenterology "S. de Bellis," Institute of Research, Castellana Grotte, Italy.
Maria De AngelisDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" · ITGiuliani (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is an inflammatory autoimmune disorder triggered by the ingestion of gluten from wheat and other cereals. Nowadays, its positive diagnosis is based on invasive approaches such as the histological examination of intestinal biopsies and positive serology screening of antibodies. After proven diagnosis, the only admissible treatment for CD individuals is strict life-long adherence to gluten-free diet (GFD), although it is not a conclusive therapy. Acting by different mechanisms and with different etiologies, both CD and GFD have a great impact on gut microbiota that result in a different taxa composition. Altered production of specific metabolites reflects these microbiota changes. In this light, the currently available literature reports some suggestions about the possible use of specific metabolites, detected by meta-omics analyses, as potential biomarkers for a CD non-invasive diagnosis. To highlight insights about metabolomics application in CD study, we conducted a narrative dissertation of selected original articles published in the last decade. By applying a systematic search, it clearly emerged how the metabolomic signature appears to be contradictory, as well as poorly investigated.

Indexed as

biomarkersceliac diseasedysbiosisgluten-free dietgut microbiotametabolomics

Identifiers

PMID35814671
PMCPMC9260055
OpenAlexW4283371075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.