Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814562›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

EEG Feature Extraction Using Evolutionary Algorithms for Brain-Computer Interface Development.

César Alfredo Rocha-Herrera, Alan Díaz-Manríquez, Jose Hugo Barron-Zambrano, Juan Carlos Elizondo-Leal, Vicente Paul Saldivar-Alonso, Jose Ramon Martínez-Angulo, Marco Aurelio Nuño-Maganda, Said Polanco-Martagon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application and Research Progress of BCI in Post-Stroke Psychiatric Disorders: A Narrative Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

César Alfredo Rocha-HerreraFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.
Alan Díaz-ManríquezFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-8316
Jose Hugo Barron-ZambranoFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0965-6714
Juan Carlos Elizondo-LealFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-8967
Vicente Paul Saldivar-AlonsoFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-0994
Jose Ramon Martínez-AnguloFacultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria 87000, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9147-0635
Marco Aurelio Nuño-MagandaIntelligent Systems Department, Polytechnic University of Victoria, Ciudad Victoria 87138, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-8227
Said Polanco-MartagonIntelligent Systems Department, Polytechnic University of Victoria, Ciudad Victoria 87138, Tamaulipas, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8473-0534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces are systems capable of mapping brain activity to specific commands, which enables to remotely automate different types of processes in hardware devices or software applications. However, the development of brain-computer interfaces has been limited by several factors that affect their performance, such as the characterization of events in brain signals and the excessive processing load generated by the high volume of data. In this paper, we propose a method based on computational intelligence techniques to handle these problems, turning them into a single optimization problem. An artificial neural network is used as a classifier for event detection, along with an evolutionary algorithm to find the optimal subset of electrodes and data points that better represents the target event. The obtained results indicate our approach is a competitive and viable alternative for feature extraction in electroencephalograms, leading to high accuracy values and allowing the reduction of a significant amount of data.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesAlgorithmsBrainElectroencephalographyNeural Networks, ComputerSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID35814562
PMCPMC9259297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.