Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814496›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2022

Neurons learn by predicting future activity.

Artur Luczak, Bruce L McNaughton, Yoshimasa Kubo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Mechanistic explanation of neuroplasticity using equivalent circuits.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Entropy of Neuronal Spike Patterns.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Learning cortical hierarchies with temporal Hebbian updates.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Artur LuczakCanadian Center for Behavioural Neuroscience; University of Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Bruce L McNaughtonCanadian Center for Behavioural Neuroscience; University of Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Yoshimasa KuboCanadian Center for Behavioural Neuroscience; University of Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
University of Lethbridge · CA

Funding

The laminar organization of 'index' versus 'attribute' coding in neocortexRF1NS121764 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MCNAUGHTON, BRUCE L · 2021 to 2021
$2.0M
CRCNS: Neural computations underlying sequence memory consolidation in sleepR01MH125557 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BAZHENOV, MAKSIM V · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125557NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS121764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how the brain learns may lead to machines with human-like intellectual capacities. It was previously proposed that the brain may operate on the principle of predictive coding. However, it is still not well understood how a predictive system could be implemented in the brain. Here we demonstrate that the ability of a single neuron to predict its future activity may provide an effective learning mechanism. Interestingly, this predictive learning rule can be derived from a metabolic principle, where neurons need to minimize their own synaptic activity (cost), while maximizing their impact on local blood supply by recruiting other neurons. We show how this mathematically derived learning rule can provide a theoretical connection between diverse types of brain-inspired algorithms, thus, offering a step toward development of a general theory of neuronal learning. We tested this predictive learning rule in neural network simulations and in data recorded from awake animals. Our results also suggest that spontaneous brain activity provides "training data" for neurons to learn to predict cortical dynamics. Thus, the ability of a single neuron to minimize surprise: i.e. the difference between actual and expected activity, could be an important missing element to understand computation in the brain.

Identifiers

PMID35814496
PMCPMC9262088
OpenAlexW4207067068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.