Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814456›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

An Integrated Analysis of Clinical, Genomic, and Imaging Features Reveals Predictors of Neurocognitive Outcomes in a Longitudinal Cohort of Pediatric Cancer Survivors, Enriched with CNS Tumors (Rad ART Pro).

Cassie Kline, Schuyler Stoller, Lennox Byer, David Samuel, Janine M Lupo, Melanie A Morrison, Andreas M Rauschecker, Pierre Nedelec, Walter Faig, Dena B Dubal and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cassie KlineDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Schuyler StollerDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Lennox ByerUCSF School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
David SamuelDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Valley Children's Hospital, Madera, CA, United States.
Janine M LupoDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Melanie A MorrisonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Andreas M RauscheckerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Pierre NedelecDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Walter FaigChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Dena B DubalDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Heather J FullertonDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
Sabine MuellerDivision of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Hospital Central California · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neurocognitive deficits in pediatric cancer survivors occur frequently; however, individual outcomes are unpredictable. We investigate clinical, genetic, and imaging predictors of neurocognition in pediatric cancer survivors, with a focus on survivors of central nervous system (CNS) tumors exposed to radiation. Methods: One hundred eighteen patients with benign or malignant cancers (median diagnosis age: 7; 32% embryonal CNS tumors) were selected from an existing multi-institutional cohort (RadART Pro) if they had: 1) neurocognitive evaluation; 2) available DNA; 3) standard imaging. Utilizing RadART Pro, we collected clinical history, genomic sequencing, CNS imaging, and neurocognitive outcomes. We performed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping for candidate genes associated with neurocognition: Results: CMB presence at baseline correlated with worse performance in 3 of 7 domains, including executive function. Higher baseline WML volumes correlated with worse performance in executive function and verbal learning. No candidate gene reliably predicted neurocognitive outcomes; however, Conclusion: Presence of CMB,

Indexed as

Apo E4late effectsneurocognitionpediatric cancer survivorsradiation

Identifiers

PMID35814456
PMCPMC9259981
OpenAlexW4283328009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.