Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814449›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

Impact of Previous Local Treatment for Brain Metastases on Response to Molecular Targeted Therapy in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Guixiang Liao, Yuxiang Fu, Sumbal Arooj, Muhammad Khan, Xianming Li, Maosheng Yan, Zihuang Li, Hongli Yang, Tao Zheng, Ruilian Xu

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of GPA, molGPA and prognostic factors in melanoma brain metastases: a single-center study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guixiang LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yuxiang FuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Sumbal AroojDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Muhammad KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Xianming LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Maosheng YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Zihuang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Hongli YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Tao ZhengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Ruilian XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Southern University of Science and Technology · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Melanoma brain metastases (BMs) are associated with poor prognosis and are the main cause of mortality in melanoma patients. BRAF inhibitors have shown intracranial activity in both treatment-naïve and previously treated BM patients. We aimed to investigate if there was any difference in response of BRAF inhibitors in these two cohorts. Materials and Methods: Electronic database search included PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane library until March 2021 for studies with desired comparative outcomes. Outcomes of interest that were obtained for meta-analysis included intracranial response rate as the primary outcome and survival and safety outcomes as the secondary outcomes. Review Manager version 5.4 was used for data analysis. Results: Three studies comprising 410 BRAF-mutated melanoma patients with BMs were included according to eligibility criteria. The comparative cohort included patients with treatment-naïve BMs (TN cohort; Conclusions: BRAF inhibitors (plus MEK inhibitor) may achieve better intracranial disease stability in BRAF-mutant melanoma patients who have received previous local treatment for BMs. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/), identifier CRD42020185984.

Indexed as

BRAF inhibitorsMEK inhibitorsmelanoma brain metastasisprevious therapyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35814449
PMCPMC9263360
OpenAlexW4283451977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.