ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Explainable Machine Learning Model to Prediction EGFR Mutation in Lung Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- NSCLC EGFR Mutation Prediction via Random Forest Model: A Clinical-CT-Radiomics Integration Approach.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- [Exploration of the Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood-related Indicators for EGFR Mutations and Prognosis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Using Machine Learning].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Article
- A potential XGBoost Diagnostic Score forFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Non-invasive, fast, and high-performance EGFR gene mutation prediction method based on deep transfer learning and model stacking for patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Impact of the number of dissected lymph nodes on machine learning-based prediction of postoperative lung cancer recurrence: a single-hospital retrospective cohort study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- Machine Learning-Based Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Model for Preoperative Predicting the Deep Stromal Invasion in Patients with Early Cervical Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Risk factors for postoperative pulmonary infections in non-small cell lung cancer: a regression-based nomogram prediction model.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- OptimalFrontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A framework for identification and classification of liver diseases based on machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Predicting Radiation Esophagitis in Patients Undergoing Synchronous Boost Radiotherapy Post-Breast-Conserving Surgery.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine whether the clinical features including blood markers can establish an explainable machine learning model to predict epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in lung cancer. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7,413 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LA) diagnosed by gene sequencing in West China Hospital of the Sichuan University from April 2015 to June 2019. The machine learning algorithms (MLAs) included logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), LightGBM, support vector machine (SVM), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and decision tree (DT). Demographic characteristics, personal history, and blood markers were taken into. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) value were used to explain the prediction models. Results: Of the 7,413 patients with LA (47.6%), 3,527 were identified with EGFR mutation; RF achieved greatest performance in predicting EGFR mutation AUC [0.771, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.770, 0.772], which was like XGBoost with AUC (0.740, 95% CI: 0.739, 0.741). The five most influential features were smoking consumption, sex, cholesterol, age, and albumin globulin ratio. The SHAP summary and dependence plot have been used to explain the affection of the 12 features to this model and how a single feature influences the output, respectively. Conclusion: We established EGFR mutation prediction models by MLAs and revealed that the RF was preferred, AUC (0.771, 95% CI: 0.770, 0.772), which was better than the traditional models. Therefore, the artificial intelligence-based MLA predicting model may become a practical tool to guide in diagnosis and therapy of LA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.