Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814374›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Dosing Pattern and Early Cumulative Dose of Liposomal Irinotecan in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-World Multicenter Study.

Yung-Yeh Su, Nai-Jung Chiang, Chung-Pin Li, Chia-Jui Yen, Shih-Hung Yang, Wen-Chi Chou, Jen-Shi Chen, Tai-Jan Chiu, Yen-Yang Chen, Shih-Chang Chuang and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Advances in Surgical Treatment Following Conversion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Yung-Yeh SuNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Nai-Jung ChiangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chung-Pin LiSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Jui YenDepartment of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Shih-Hung YangDepartment of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi ChouDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Jen-Shi ChenDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tai-Jan ChiuDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yen-Yang ChenDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shih-Chang ChuangDivision of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Li-Yuan BaiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, and China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chang-Fang ChiuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, and China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Ming PengDepartment of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital and Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
De-Chuan ChanDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sz-Chi ChiuDepartment of Sales and Marketing, PharmaEngine, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Hsin YangNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yan-Shen ShanInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Li-Tzong ChenNational Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan.
Chang Gung University · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWChina Medical University Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · TWNational Cheng Kung University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This multicenter, real-world cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early cumulative dose administration and dosing pattern of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI+5-FU/LV) in patients with gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Material and Methods: The electronic medical records of mPDAC patients treated with nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in nine participating centers were manually reviewed. To accommodate to the NAPOLI-1 study population, only patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score of 0-1 were included. The survival impact of the relative 6-week cumulative dose and dosing pattern (standard vs. reduced starting dose, with and without further dose modification) were investigated. Results: Of the 473 included patients, their median overall survival (mOS) was 6.8 [95% CI, 6.2-7.7] months. The mOS of patients who received a relative 6-week cumulative dose of >80%, 60%-80%, and <60% were 7.9, 8.2, and 4.3 months, respectively (p<0.0001). Their survival impact remained significant after covariate adjustment using Cox regression. The mOS was 8.0-8.2 months in patients with a standard starting dose with and without early dose modification, and 9.3 and 6.7 months in those who had a reduced starting dose with and without escalation in the subsequent treatment, respectively. The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia and diarrhea was 23.3% and 2.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Our results support the use of nal-IRI+5-FU/LV in gemcitabine-refractory mPDAC and suggest that a lower starting dose followed by a re-escalation strategy could achieve clinical outcomes comparable to those with standard starting doses in real-world practice.

Indexed as

dose escalation strategydose intensitynal-IRIpancreatic cancerreal world

Identifiers

PMID35814374
PMCPMC9256928
OpenAlexW4283265008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.