Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814362›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram to Predict Lung Metastasis in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: A Multi-Center Study.

Hao-Yu Liang, Shi-Feng Yang, Hong-Mei Zou, Feng Hou, Li-Sha Duan, Chen-Cui Huang, Jing-Xu Xu, Shun-Li Liu, Da-Peng Hao, He-Xiang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Radiomics of multi-parametric MRI for the prediction of lung metastasis in soft-tissue sarcoma: a feasibility study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Multi-institutional validation of a radiomics signature for identification of postoperative progression of soft tissue sarcoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Hao-Yu LiangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Shi-Feng YangDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Hong-Mei ZouDepartment of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Qingdao, Qingdao, China.
Feng HouDepartment of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Li-Sha DuanDepartment of Radiology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Chen-Cui HuangDepartment of Research Collaboration, Research and Development (R&D) Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of Philosophy Doctor (PHD) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jing-Xu XuDepartment of Research Collaboration, Research and Development (R&D) Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of Philosophy Doctor (PHD) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Shun-Li LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Da-Peng HaoDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
He-Xiang WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CNQingdao University · CNHebei Medical University · CNHubei Zhongshan Hospital · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To build and evaluate a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) for preoperative prediction of lung metastasis (LM) status in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Methods: In total, 242 patients with STS (training set, n=116; external validation set, n=126) who underwent magnetic resonance imaging were retrospectively enrolled in this study. We identified independent predictors for LM-status and evaluated their performance. The minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) method and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were adopted to screen radiomics features. Logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, support vector machine (SVM), and adaptive boosting classifiers were compared for their ability to predict LM. To overcome the imbalanced distribution of the LM data, we retrained each machine-learning classifier using the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE). A DLRN combining the independent clinical predictors with the best performing radiomics prediction signature (mRMR+LASSO+SVM+SMOTE) was established. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the performance and clinical applicability of the models. Result: Comparisons of the AUC values applied to the external validation set revealed that the DLRN model (AUC=0.833) showed better prediction performance than the clinical model (AUC=0.664) and radiomics model (AUC=0.799). The calibration curves indicated good calibration efficiency and the DCA showed the DLRN model to have greater clinical applicability than the other two models. Conclusion: The DLRN was shown to be an accurate and efficient tool for LM-status prediction in STS.

Indexed as

deep learninglung metastasismagnetic resonance imagingradiomics nomogramsoft tissue sarcomas

Identifiers

PMID35814362
PMCPMC9265249
OpenAlexW4283391799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.