Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814348›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in computational neuroscience2022

On the Role of Neural Oscillations Across Timescales in Speech and Music Processing.

G Nike Gnanateja, Dhatri S Devaraju, Matthias Heyne, Yina M Quique, Kevin R Sitek, Monique C Tardif, Rachel Tessmer, Heather R Dial

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G Nike GnanatejaDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Dhatri S DevarajuDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Matthias HeyneDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Yina M QuiqueCenter for Education in Health Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kevin R SitekDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Monique C TardifDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Rachel TessmerDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Heather R DialDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
University of Pittsburgh · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Investigating human non-lemniscal inferior colliculus contributions to auditory learning with 7T MRIK01DC019421 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Kevin Richard Sitek · 2022 to 2026
$710k
Investigating Neural Signatures of Rehabilitation in Primary Progressive AphasiaF32DC016812 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DIAL, HEATHER R · 2018 to 2020
$192k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC016812NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC019421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This mini review is aimed at a clinician-scientist seeking to understand the role of oscillations in neural processing and their functional relevance in speech and music perception. We present an overview of neural oscillations, methods used to study them, and their functional relevance with respect to music processing, aging, hearing loss, and disorders affecting speech and language. We first review the oscillatory frequency bands and their associations with speech and music processing. Next we describe commonly used metrics for quantifying neural oscillations, briefly touching upon the still-debated mechanisms underpinning oscillatory alignment. Following this, we highlight key findings from research on neural oscillations in speech and music perception, as well as contributions of this work to our understanding of disordered perception in clinical populations. Finally, we conclude with a look toward the future of oscillatory research in speech and music perception, including promising methods and potential avenues for future work. We note that the intention of this mini review is not to systematically review all literature on cortical tracking of speech and music. Rather, we seek to provide the clinician-scientist with foundational information that can be used to evaluate and design research studies targeting the functional role of oscillations in speech and music processing in typical and clinical populations.

Indexed as

cortical entrainmentcortical trackingelectrophysiologymusic processingneural oscillationsneurogenic communication disordersspeech processingspeech tracking

Identifiers

PMID35814348
PMCPMC9260496
OpenAlexW4283317133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.