Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814311›Full record

ArticleMRS bulletin2022

Translation of 3D printed materials for medical applications.

Amit Bandyopadhyay, Susmita Bose, Roger Narayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MRS bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amit BandyopadhyayW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0992-5387
Susmita BoseW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Lab, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, USA.
Roger NarayanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina and North Carolina State University, USA.

Funding

3D Printed Surface Modified Porous Metal Coatings for Load-Bearing ImplantsR01AR067306 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BANDYOPADHYAY, AMIT · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
3D Printed Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds with Natural Medicinal Compounds for Dental ApplicationsR01DE029204 · NIDCR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSE, SUSMITA · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Surface modified metal implants using doped hydroxyapatiteR01AR066361 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSE, SUSMITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066361NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067306NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past 30 years, 3D printing (3DP) technologies significantly influenced the manufacturing world, including innovation in biomedical devices. This special issue reviews recent advances in translating 3DP biomaterials and medical devices for metallic, ceramic, and polymeric devices, as well as bioprinting for organ and tissue engineering, along with regulatory issues in 3DP biomaterials. In our introductory article, besides introducing selected 3DP processes for biomaterials, current challenges and growth opportunities are also discussed. Finally, it highlights a few success stories for the 3D printed biomaterials for medical devices. We hope these articles will educate engineers, scientists, and clinicians about recent developments in translational 3DP technologies.

Identifiers

PMID35814311
PMCPMC9267199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.