Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814294›Full record

ReviewCommunications medicine2022

Making cough count in tuberculosis care.

Alexandra J Zimmer, César Ugarte-Gil, Rahul Pathri, Puneet Dewan, Devan Jaganath, Adithya Cattamanchi, Madhukar Pai, Simon Grandjean Lapierre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cough monitoring systems in adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra J ZimmerDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6047-0923
César Ugarte-GilSchool of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Rahul PathriDocturnal Pvt. Ltd., R&D, Hyderabad, India.
Puneet DewanBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA USA.
Devan JaganathDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.
Adithya CattamanchiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6553-2601
Madhukar PaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Simon Grandjean LapierreMcGill International TB Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3646-1573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cough assessment is central to the clinical management of respiratory diseases, including tuberculosis (TB), but strategies to objectively and unobtrusively measure cough are lacking. Acoustic epidemiology is an emerging field that uses technology to detect cough sounds and analyze cough patterns to improve health outcomes among people with respiratory conditions linked to cough. This field is increasingly exploring the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) for more advanced applications, such as analyzing cough sounds as a biomarker for disease screening. While much of the data are preliminary, objective cough assessment could potentially transform disease control programs, including TB, and support individual patient management. Here, we present an overview of recent advances in this field and describe how cough assessment, if validated, could support public health programs at various stages of the TB care cascade.

Indexed as

Diagnostic markersPrognostic markersTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID35814294
PMCPMC9258463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.