ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2022
The utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in a community with a high HIV and tuberculosis burden.
Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time for action: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in low- and middle-income countries.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2026Article
- The utility of transbronchial cryobiopsy performed under conscious sedation for interstitial lung diseases in a resource constrained setting.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Real time endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of tuberculous intrathoracic lymphadenopathy: Saudi Arabian Western region experience.Saudi medical journal · 2023Article
- EBUS-TBNA: A high-yield diagnostic procedure for benign and malignant aetiologies.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has become the gold standard in diagnosing and performing nodal staging in patients with suspected lung cancer and diagnosing other malignant and benign diseases. Studies from countries with low tuberculosis (TB) incidence suggest that it has a sensitivity of 90 - 95% and a specificity of 100%. Objectives: To investigate the utility of EBUS-TBNA in a community with a high HIV and TB burden. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA to confirm a tissue diagnosis during a 2-year period from January 2017 - December 2018. Only patients with complete medical, pathology and radiology records and follow-up were included. Results: During the 2 years, a total of 201 patients underwent EBUS-TBNA. Some patients (n=19) had incomplete notes or follow-up and 104 cases were ultimately diagnosed with benign nodal disease. In the 182 patients who were ultimately included in the present study, EBUS-TBNA had a sensitivity of 95.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 88.6 - 98.2), specificity of 100% (95% CI 94.20 - 100), positive predictive value (PPV) of 100.00% (95% CI 95.3 - 100) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.1% (95% CI 86.0 - 97.8) for all diagnoses. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 97.3% (95% CI 93.9 - 99.2). Out of the 64 patients who had lung cancer, EBUS-TBNA had a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI 86.7 - 99.0), specificity of 100% (95% CI 5.5 - 100), PPV of 100.0% and NPV of 58.3% (95% CI 31.7 - 80.9). The overall diagnostic accuracy for lung cancer was 95.5% (95% CI 87.2 - 99.1%). Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA has high diagnostic accuracy, even in a population with a high HIV and TB burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.