Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35814114›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Reverse-Coded Items Do Not Work in Spanish: Data From Four Samples Using Established Measures.

Amanda Venta, Cassandra A Bailey, Jesse Walker, Alfonso Mercado, Cecilia Colunga-Rodriguez, Mario Ángel-González, Gabriel Dávalos-Picazo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Amanda VentaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Cassandra A BaileyDepartment of Psychology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, United States.
Jesse WalkerDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Alfonso MercadoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States.
Cecilia Colunga-RodriguezDivisión de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.
Mario Ángel-GonzálezDivisión de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, México.
Gabriel Dávalos-PicazoDepartamento de Psicología y Pedagogía, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, España.
University of Houston · USMexican Social Security Institute · MXSam Houston State University · USThe University of Texas Rio Grande Valley · USUniversidad de Guadalajara · MXUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential for suboptimal psychometric performance of reverse-coded items may be particularly pronounced when scales are translated and administered in Spanish with these problems exacerbated in youth respondents. This is a significant concern, given the rapid rise in Hispanic-American and Spanish-speaking individuals in the US and their rightful, growing representation in psychological research and clinical care. The aim of this study was to examine the psychometric performance of reverse-coded items across four Spanish-speaking samples spanning developmental stages including youth, college students, and parents (

Indexed as

HispanicLatino/a/xreliabilityreverse codingreverse scoredtranslation

Identifiers

PMID35814114
PMCPMC9261978
OpenAlexW4283388294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.