Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813985›Full record

ArticleIEEE sensors journal2021

Detection of Food Intake Sensor's Wear Compliance in Free-Living.

Tonmoy Ghosh, Delwar Hossain, Edward Sazonov

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Objective Assessment of Media Screens Effect on Physical Activity in Preschool Children.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tonmoy GhoshDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 USA.
Delwar HossainDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 USA.
Edward SazonovDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 USA.
University of Alabama · US

Funding

Sensor-based Just-in Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) Targeting Eating BehaviorR01DK122473 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI SAZONOV, EDWARD S, THOMAS, JOHN GRAHAM · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Assessing Food Intake with the Automatic Ingestion MonitorR01DK100796 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA IN TUSCALOOSA · PI MCCRORY, MEGAN A, SAZONOV, EDWARD S · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100796NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective detection of periods of wear and non-wear is critical for human studies that rely on information from wearable sensors, such as food intake sensors. In this paper, we present a novel method of compliance detection on the example of the Automatic Ingestion Monitor v2 (AIM-2) sensor, containing a tri-axial accelerometer, a still camera, and a chewing sensor. The method was developed and validated using data from a study of 30 participants aged 18-39, each wearing the AIM-2 for two days (a day in pseudo-free-living and a day in free-living). Four types of wear compliance were analyzed: 'normal-wear', 'non-compliant-wear', 'non-wear-carried', and 'non-wear-stationary'. The ground truth of those four types of compliance was obtained by reviewing the images of the egocentric camera. The features for compliance detection were the standard deviation of acceleration, average pitch, and roll angles, and mean square error of two consecutive images. These were used to train three random forest classifiers 1) accelerometer-based, 2) image-based, and 3) combined accelerometer and image-based. Satisfactory wear compliance measurement accuracy was obtained using the combined classifier (89.24%) on leave one subject out cross-validation. The average duration of compliant wear in the study was 9h with a standard deviation of 2h or 70.96% of total on-time. This method can be used to calculate the wear and non-wear time of AIM-2, and potentially be extended to other devices. The study also included assessments of sensor burden and privacy concerns. The survey results suggest recommendations that may be used to increase wear compliance.

Indexed as

accelerometeradherencecomplianceegocentric camerafood intakewear compliance

Identifiers

PMID35813985
PMCPMC9268495
OpenAlexW3209905771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.