ReviewJournal of clinical and translational research2022
Artificial intelligence and lymphedema: State of the art.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07485465 (The Role of Chat GPT in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphedema), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Role of Chat GPT in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphedema
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine Learning to Predict Extranodal Extension in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Laryngoscope · 2026Pooled it
- The usefulness of artificial intelligence in breast reconstruction: a systematic review.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Pooled it
- AI Quality Standards in Health Care: Rapid Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence and Robotic Surgery in Lymphedema: A Scoping Review of Current Applications, Clinical Translation, and Evidence Gaps.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- "Debulking" the future of lymphedema surgery: A narrative review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Lymphedema imaging and AI: A review of diagnostic modalities, biomarkers, and clinical integration.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Frequency and Distribution of Lymphatic Filariasis in Somalia: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of tropical medicine · 2026Article
- Lymphedema: current treatment strategies and future directions in tissue engineering.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Empowered Mechanomedicine for Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Technology-enhanced compression and AI-integrated lymphedema care: a narrative review.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Review
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Health Care Social Robots in the Age of Generative AI: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Microsurgical treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema under contrast-enhanced ultrasound guidance: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- The Role of Imaging of Lymphatic System to Prevent Cancer Related Lymphedema.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymphedema practice is facing many challenges. Some of these challenges include eradication of tropical lymphedema, preclinical diagnosis of cancer-related lymphedema, and delivery of appropriate individualized care. The past two decades have witnessed an increasing implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in health-care services. The nature of the challenges facing the lymphedema practice is suitable for AI applications. Aim: The aim of this study was to explore the current AI applications in lymphedema prevention, diagnosis, and management and investigate the potential future applications. Methods and Results: Four databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as our basis of organization. Our analysis showed that several domains of AI, including machine learning (ML), fuzzy models, deep learning, and robotics, were successfully implemented in lymphedema practice. ML can guide the eradication campaigns of tropical lymphedema by estimating disease prevalence and mapping the risk areas. Robotic-assisted surgery for gynecological cancer was associated with a lower risk for the lower limb lymphedema. Several feasible models were described for the early detection and diagnosis of lymphedema. The proposed models are more accurate, sensitive, and specific than current methods in practice. ML was also used to guide and monitor patients during the rehabilitation exercises. Conclusion: AI offers a variety of solutions to the most challenging problems in lymphedema practice. Further, implementation into the practice can revolutionize many aspects of lymphedema prevention, diagnosis, and management. Relevance to Patients: Lymphedema is a chronic debilitating disease that is affecting millions of patients. Developing new modalities for prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment are critical to improve the outcomes. AI offers a variety of solutions for some of the complexities of lymphedema management. In this systematic review, we summarize and discuss the latest AI advances in lymphedema practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35813896PMC9260343W4285046851What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.