Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813867›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2022

Preoperative Prediction Value of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis of Endometrial Cancer: Combining of ADC Value and Radiomics Features of the Primary Lesion and Clinical Parameters.

Juan Bo, Haodong Jia, Yu Zhang, Baoyue Fu, Xueyan Jiang, Yulan Chen, Bin Shi, Xin Fang, Jiangning Dong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Juan BoDepartment of Radiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-8154
Haodong JiaDepartment of Radiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-9831
Yu ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5394-1686
Baoyue FuBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3097-2404
Xueyan JiangBengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui 233030, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-6061
Yulan ChenDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-4146
Bin ShiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4214-6940
Xin FangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0097-7682
Jiangning DongDepartment of Radiology, Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2954-076X
University of Science and Technology of China · CNAnhui Medical University · CNBengbu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value of endometrial cancer (EC) primary lesion and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) three-dimensional (3D) radiomics features combined with clinical parameters for preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM). Methods: A total of 136 patients with EC confirmed by postoperative pathology were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Patients were randomly divided into training set ( Results: The ADC value of the EC primary lesion showed inverse correlation with PLNM, while CA125 and Rads-score were positively associated with PLNM. A predictive model was proposed based on ADC value, Rads-score, CA125, and MR-reported pelvic lymph node status (PLNS) for PLNM in EC. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model is 0.940; the sensitivity and specificity (87.1% and 90.6%) of the model were significantly higher than that of the MRI morphological signs. Conclusion: A combination of ADC value, MRI 3D radiomics features of the EC primary lesion, and clinical parameters generated a prediction model for PLNM in EC and had a good diagnostic performance; it was a useful supplement to MR-reported PLNS based on MRI morphological signs.

Identifiers

PMID35813867
PMCPMC9262528
OpenAlexW4283732935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.