Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813832›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Approaches to Using the Chameleon: Robust, Automated, Fast-Plunge cryoEM Specimen Preparation.

Talya S Levitz, Miriam Weckener, Ivan Fong, James H Naismith, Catherine L Drennan, Edward J Brignole, Daniel K Clare, Michele C Darrow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Microsecond Time-Resolved Cryo-EM Based on Jet Vitrification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Capturing a methanogenic carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase complex via cryogenic electron microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Handling Difficult Cryo-ET Samples: A Study with Primary Neurons from Drosophila melanogaster.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Recent advances and current trends in cryo-electron microscopy.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Talya S LevitzDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Miriam WeckenerStructural Biology, The Rosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Science Campus, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Ivan FongSPT Labtech, Melbourn, United Kingdom.
James H NaismithStructural Biology, The Rosalind Franklin Institute, Harwell Science Campus, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Catherine L DrennanDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Edward J BrignoleDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Daniel K ClareDiamond Light Source Ltd., Harwell Science Campus, Didcot, United Kingdom.
Michele C DarrowSPT Labtech, Melbourn, United Kingdom.

Funding

PRE-DOCTORAL TRAINING IN THE BIOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007287 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BELL, STEPHEN P., KEATING, AMY E · 1985 to 2019
$40.8M
Metalloenzyme structure, function and assemblyR35GM126982 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CATHERINE L DRENNAN · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126982NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specimen preparation process is a key determinant in the success of any cryo electron microscopy (cryoEM) structural study and until recently had remained largely unchanged from the initial designs of Jacques Dubochet and others in the 1980s. The process has transformed structural biology, but it is largely manual and can require extensive optimisation for each protein sample. The chameleon instrument with its self-wicking grids and fast-plunge freezing represents a shift towards a robust, automated, and highly controllable future for specimen preparation. However, these new technologies require new workflows and an understanding of their limitations and strengths. As early adopters of the chameleon technology, we report on our experiences and lessons learned through case studies. We use these to make recommendations for the benefit of future users of the chameleon system and the field of cryoEM specimen preparation generally.

Indexed as

air-water interface issuesautomationcryoEM specimen preparationdenaturation/dissociationpreferred orientationself-wicking gridsvitrification

Identifiers

PMID35813832
PMCPMC9260054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.