Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35813754›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for smooth benign appearing malignant esophageal stricture: a cross-sectional study.

Fuliang Cao, Guofeng Chen, Wei Su, Zhen Zhang, Qianqian Fu, Dejun Zhou, Zhenbo Dai

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fuliang CaoDepartment of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Guofeng ChenDepartment of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Wei SuDepartment of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Qianqian FuDepartment of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Dejun ZhouDepartment of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Zhenbo DaiDepartment of Endoscopy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic biopsy is standard for the diagnosis of esophageal malignancy. However, few cases are difficult to diagnose as they present with smooth esophageal stricture with negative biopsy results. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the diagnosis of biopsy-negative suspected malignant esophageal strictures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed cases of esophageal stricture with negative biopsies. From September 2016 to November 2021, 50 patients were enrolled. All the patients accepted the EUS-FNA examination. And histological and cytological specimens were obtained from all patients. Clinical, endoscopic, imaging, cytological, and histopathological results were noted and analyzed. Results: A total of 50 patients (40 male and 10 female) were enrolled in this study. The 19G puncture needle was used in 6 cases and the 22G puncture needle was used in 44 cases; an average of 2.7 needles were used per case. Satisfactory specimens were obtained by EUS-FNA for all subjects. All patients were diagnosed as malignant tumor. The diagnosis was confirmed by EUS-FNA biopsies in 98% of patients. Based on the surgical pathology results, there were 16 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 2 cases of esophageal metastatic carcinoma, 1 case of esophageal sarcoma, 22 cases of lung cancer, 6 cases of mediastinal lymph node metastasis, and 3 cases of mediastinal tumor. No obvious complications were observed. A total of 5 cases were treated with surgery, 28 with chemotherapy, 3 with chemotherapy + surgery, and 12 with radiotherapy; 2 patients ceased treatment. No obvious complications, such as bleeding and mediastinal infection, were observed. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is effective and safe for the diagnosis of malignant esophageal strictures with smooth overlying esophageal mucosa. EUS-FNA is effective and safe for patients with smooth esophagus stenosis for whom satisfactory cytological and histological specimens can be obtained, and the diagnosis can be confirmed by cytological, histological, and immunohistochemical examinations. It can be used as the first choice for diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA)etiologySmooth esophagus stricture

Identifiers

PMID35813754
PMCPMC9264049
OpenAlexW4285047450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.